User talk:AutisticAndrew/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia, AutisticAndrew!
I'm Tesseractic and I want to welcome you to Wikipedia!

Wikipedia is an amazing community adventure which is constantly being edited. There are many different versions of Wikipedia for many different languages, and the English version has articles which are written by volunteers like you and me! We even have a newspaper, The Signpost, to keep you up to date with news and new developments. Making your first steps on Wikipedia can be hard sometimes, so if you need any help, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page or ask a question on your talk page. Someone will help you soon!

Wikipedia has five pillars which summarise Wikipedia's fundamental principles:
 * 1) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
 * 2) Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
 * 3) Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
 * 4) Editors should treat each other with respect and civility
 * 5) Wikipedia has no firm rules

Discover more about Wikipedia and how to take part in this project by looking at the links on the right → Or if you don't know where to start, visit the Task Center, and find a way you can help improve Wikipedia straight away!


 * I hope you have a good time here on Wikipedia, whether reading or contributing.

Again, welcome!   17:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Re:Jagjaguwar
I'm well aware of the edit war rules, and if you look back to before the date of your account creation, you will find that I have talked voluminously with this editor. The conversations are instructive and I invite you to read them, as you will see which of the two of us is the more persistently aggressive reverter. Chubbles (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you that you acknowledge your behaviour, Chubbles.  The Banner  talk 12:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Regardless, edit warring isn't acceptable, any disputes should be discussed on the articles talk page, even if your edits were right it isn't an excuse to edit war. AutisticAndrew (talk) 21:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brian Brunette have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brian Brunette was changed by AutisticAndrew (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852128 on 2024-05-31T21:51:14+00:00

revert
you reverted my edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baalveer_Returns&diff=prev&oldid=1226886391&title=Baalveer_Returns&diffonly=1

but I explained the reasons....

revert
Hey i added verifiable references from the sources but you reverted my edits, why? Manfrombongo (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Pronouns
Hello, I'm Gottagotospace. I noticed that you changed the personal pronouns of an individual in the article Nemo. Wikipedia refers to all people, including transgender and nonbinary people, by the pronouns they have most recently requested for themselves; this applies to all phases of their lives, unless they have requested otherwise. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gottagotospace (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Cheers!  AutisticAndrew (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Rob Burrow

 * Thanks for the heads up. - AutisticAndrew (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Twinkle. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Stop doing this. Per WP:BRD discuss your contested edit on the article's talk page. Do not continue to restore it.'' Meters (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * , certainly it's time to use the talk page, but I see nothing "unconstructive" or "disruptive" about AutisticAndrew's edits. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your input, however having a such a statement conflicts with the fact many tools have a revert good faith option - AutisticAndrew (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That may be correct, but simply deleting a long-standing part of the article is probably not the right approach. A more nuanced change is likely going to be a better solution in this case. Per WP:BRD you should discuss the contested change on the article's talk page rather than restoring it. The thread has already been started. You were warned for edit warring just the day before, so you already know that you should not simply restore a contested edit. Doing so is disruptive. Blanking your warnings does change anything. Meters (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Nice to know blanking warnings does change anything. - AutisticAndrew (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, AutisticAndrew! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2025 FIFA Club World Cup several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I respectfully suggest you also read WP:ENGVAR and WP:3RR. You have pretty clearly violated the latter policy, which is a brightline rule that would allow an administrator to block you from editing. I see, however, that your account is pretty new, so I don't think asking the administrators to take that action seems justified at this point.. 1995hoo (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Stubbornness of user AutisticAndrew and not being collaborative.. Thank you. notifying on behalf of, who has failed to do so. Mdann52 (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Howdy
Howdy, how goes it? If you need any help with anything, ping me on my talk page.  scope_creep Talk  20:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Cheers - AutisticAndrew (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Discussion invitation regarding Jeremy Finlayson
Hello, you are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jeremy Finlayson § Slur incident details. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding reversion
Greeting.. Regarding my edit which you reverted

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Honn%C5%8D-ji_Incident&diff=prev&oldid=1226983667&title=Honn%C5%8D-ji_Incident&diffonly=1

it was my bad doesnt explain the reason for my edit. But i have good reason about the change, since i only correcting the content translation, which was not "200 outlaws killed" but "200 escorts of Tokugawa killed during the journey".

Anyway you can check it too from the reliable source regarding that matter by Professor Watanabe Daimon from Bukkyo University

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/d5992f536671eecc61168e6a6480c9358beafe51 118.136.222.156 (talk) 10:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Navigation Bar
It seems like on your navigation bar that the contributions and EditCount links to Ronhjones's instead of yours. Please change it to yours so that other editors won't get confused about your account being globally locked where in fact it is obviously not. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * All sorted now, thanks for the heads up. - AutisticAndrew (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring at 2023–24 UEFA Champions League
Your recent editing history at 2023–24 UEFA Champions League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

It is plain that you have violated the three-revert rule on June 5 even though I advised you about the rule on June 4 (in a comment you have since moved to your talk page archive, as is your right). I'm going offline for nine days, so I'm not going to make an administrator report because I won't be available to follow up if they want something from me. But I wanted to make sure you receive the appropriate warning. I strongly encourage you to rethink your insistence on getting your way. The three-revert rule does not contain exceptions for "this is in discussion on the talk page" or "I know I'm right" or the like. 1995hoo (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Slow down please
Your natural inclination appears to be to hit revert when patrolling without taking the time to review the edits you're reverting (like this edit from today, for example). Please slow down and, as has been requested from you many times, use an edit summary to explain your reverts.-- Ponyo bons mots 18:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Cheers! -- Autistic Andrew   23:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Football grounds
There is an ongoing discussion about changes such as this on WikiProject Football. I support the view that "in the case of a stadium like Anfield we definitely need to show the F.C., as simply writing "owner: Liverpool" could give the impression that it is owned by the city itself". The same applies to Turf Moor and Burnley. Paul W (talk) 11:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)