User talk:Auto Correct

BKWSU article
Could you add your sources when you make edits, please?

Also, I think you were wrong to capitalise "one". In that context it is not used as a honorific.

Thank you. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have flagged up this account as a possible sockpuppet of Maleabroad. Apologise if I am wrong but we had similar problems on the [[BKWSU] article before.


 * What you are adding is highly incorrect and unsubstantiated from a BK point of view. Your own projection, in essence. Please join in the discussion first. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

BKWSU
Don't make any accusations. If you've read Wiki policies, you should know that.

How am I projecting my own views? I am citing from researchers' books, aren't I? - Auto Correct —Preceding comment was added at 04:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * But are they in anyway relevant? What have they got to do with the BKWSU? Please offer your sources on the discussion page for peer review.


 * I flagged up your account as a possible sockpuppet of Maleabroad because you seem to have a similar radical style and Hindu position. We had problems with him before on the BKWSU page. Please don't cause problems. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You are the one causing problems. I have neither "radical style" or a "Hindu position". I am citing referenced material! - Auto Correct —Preceding comment was added at 19:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It is not accurate, not relevant and not referenced.


 * For example ... show me one citation that says "BK Raja Yoga is derived or related from Patanjali's Raja Yoga"?


 * What actual involvement with the BKWSU have you had because your terminology and account of their philosophy is all wrong? --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

How is my material "not reference" or "not relevant"? I've read the book and that's what the scholar says. - Auto Correct

You need a citation? "The Brahma Kumaris movement (BK) (see Chapter 11) is one of several examples of Neo-Hindu movements that promote applied spirituality" from New Religious Movement in Global Perspective: A STUDY OF RELIGIOUS CHANGE IN THE MODERN WORLD By P. Clarke. I have no experience with the BK also do have researched it. - Auto Correct —Preceding comment was added at 22:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Please keep this conversation in one place ... My guess you took the title above from Google books or Amazon. It is not a properly related references with quotation, so who know what you are saying abut what. See the comment about Patanjali above. Your comment was ABSOLUTELY incorrect. The BKs do not have a connection with Patanjali, don't as a matter of course call ShivBaba "Lord Shiva", don't obviously equate Shiva to Shankar (actualy they say Brahma becomes Shankar, don't use the term Mahayogi or what ever the other one you used (this is an English language Wiki) and so on ... is that comprehensive enough for you? The BKWSU have a different meaning for just about every Hindi term they use. "Neo-" is mentioned in the lead paragraph and you went off the sub-section topic (God) into other stuff.


 * Bottomline, your edits reveal a lack of knowledge in the actual topic and and your edit summaries suggest read aggressively. Perhaps you would be better off sticking to whichever Wiki is in your native language. I am sorry but as much as I am expected to be reasonable, you have to respect others time in return too.


 * Thank you. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)