User talk:AutomaticWriting/archive1

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind....
but I'm going to go ahead and ninja your religion UBX to use in my user page. Mattlittlej (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome again
On the talk page of meat, you requested a minor change be made to the article(I've done it). I'm going to encourage you to Be Bold and go for it! You can change ANYTHING! I absolutely love your user name by the way. Happy editing --Banana04131 00:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. The reason I didn't change it was because I wasn't 100% sure of my facts. St jimmy 15:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

i would like to join how do i tho
i want to join the counter vandalism unit


 * Go to my user page and click the link in the Counter-Vandalism unit box. There'll be instructions there. St jimmy 09:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I would suggest not permitting a vandal to join. — ceejayoz talk 17:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Im not a vandal, you(Ceejayoz) are an idiot, your atheism is proof


 * WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN? St jimmy 11:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I wasnt talking to u saint jimmy


 * That's not the point. I could be an atheist as well (I'm not as it happens). How does being an atheist make me an idiot. Blind faith is even more stupid. Don't be such an intolerant dick. St jimmy 11:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

i do agree with u faith is another word for ignorance, but if u doint believe in anything, ure an idiot


 * That's shit and you know it. Some of the most intelligent people on the planet are atheists. St jimmy 13:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

like who, theyre either jews or christians


 * Like most of the world's scientists. And what about muslims, buddists and hindus? St jimmy 09:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

there 2 busy running planes into buildings or learning self control from n 800 lb. god (buddha), there idiots 2


 * You are such a fucking racist. Any1 who disagrees with you is an idiot that makes you an idiot. St jimmy 10:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

that doesnt make sense andits my point of view so wat


 * You dont respect other ppls point of view or religion. Whatever you belive has to be right and any1 who disagrees is an idiot. St jimmy 11:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

no, i am just rite most of the time


 * You may believe you're right but other ppl don't. They hold different beliefs. That doesn't make them idiots it just makes them different. St jimmy 13:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

no but being an extremist makes u retard and most of them are extremists


 * No they're not. Most ppl aren't extremeists. That's why the extremists are called extremists. S t. J immy 09:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

that didnt make senses rare isnt the same as extremists


 * Yeah but there have to be moderates to make the extremists extremists. And anyway, it's not fair to say all Muslims are extremists bcos its blatantly not true. S t. J immy 11:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

2 of my friends r muslims i have no problem with that, middle eastern muslims are dangerous

Not all of them. S t. J immy 11:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * right, there all friendly people who love americans, (im being sarcastic by the way)--Andy 23:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Very few people outside of america love america. It's not just muslims who hate americans. S t. J immy 11:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

no i no a lot of non americans who love and envy them


 * envy?S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 10:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * ya, the capitolism and the freedom, etc.--Andy 20:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

capitalism isn't a good thing. Americans just think it is. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 11:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * where are u from, and by the way being rich uis a great thing, even the chance of being rich is a good thing--Andy 21:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

In order yo have rich people there must also be poor people. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 19:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * not necesarilly.--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 01:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Richness is relative. If we can all afford to pay more for products then prices go up until some people can't. They are the poor. The only way to avoid that is if everyone has exactly the same amount of money and that is called Communism. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 22:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

not everyone has to be the same, there ar just no poor people, --<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 23:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

the people with least are the poor <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 09:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

in communism everyone is poor, in my dreamworld, everyone is rich, there is no one who has least--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 06:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes but unfortunately your dreamworld is just that - a dream. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 21:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

But what about the political aspects of communism, less freedom is given to the people, in the gov I'm describing, money is the same but monetary aspects are different then communism.--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 03:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Well how do you keep money the same? Does the government take it all and then share it out equally every so often? In that case why would anyone bother to work hard? Then you'd have to make people work - ie restrict freedom. That's why communism became what it became.

If the govt. doesn't do what I said then after a few generations there will be a divide between rich and poor again. That's how free-market, capitalism works. Some people succeed - other's fail. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 21:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Why would the people not want to work so hard, just because you want it to be true doesnt mean it is, everybody works hard at there jobs in this GOV.--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 19:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

People work hard for financial gain. If the government just evens it out every so often then there is no gain so SOME people won't work hard. That's what happened in Communist countries and that's why Stalin, for example, had to force people into Gulags. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 21:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

what are we arguing about again?--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 04:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I was explaining why Capitalism is an imperfect system. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 21:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

No system is perfect, but in my opinion its the best system, communism fails becuse people are greedy, it's naturally intilled in the human psyche.--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 06:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

That's why all systems ultimately fail. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 16:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Yo
Whats wrong wit my man G.W Bush


 * He's an idiot with too much power. St jimmy 09:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

So every president has 2 much power? Swainstonation

we have a congress and a supreme court for a reason, so 1 person doesnt get 2 powerful


 * He's too stupid to be president. And he's crazy. he said God told him to invade iraq. St jimmy 11:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

so what he has religion, thats a good thing, hes not crazy eithe, ur crazy cuz ur a commie

"rather be dead than red"


 * My problems not with him being religious, it's with him hearing voices. And having the power to launch a war based on what those voices telling him. St jimmy 11:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

he alone doesnt have the power to launch the war, u need congress and the UN to agree, so u think everyone involved in the government is "hearing voices" with him, ur paranoid


 * He has the power to send troops wherever he wants. he just needs congress to approve funding.
 * And he's ruining the environment. He pulled the US out of the kyoto agreement. He says (until recently) that global warming is just a theory.St jimmy 13:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

ya but there is no real reason behind why its happening, it could just be an uatural process (global warming), dont u need money to send troops anywhere, they cant just walk and eat sand, you have ship them out and supply them with goods


 * Yes global warming occurs naturally, but slowly. We are acelerating the process by pumping CO2 into the air. The science is there to back it up.


 * And he can send troops wherever he wants without consulting congress. Once they're there congress has to provide funding or allow troops to die. St jimmy 11:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

he only has 3 more years so stop woerrying sbout it and its not just him hoo causes C02 gas to go in there air its everybody


 * Yes but Kyoto was meant to cut down emissions from countries. But the biggest polluter in the world (the US) isn't part of it. That's his fault.


 * And 3 years is pleanty of time for him to fuck up the worldSt jimmy 10:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

its commies like u hoo fuck up the world


 * It wasn't commies who dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. It wasn't commies who invaded Iraq for oil. And It isn't commies who are gonna start a war in the Middle East and bring about our destruction with global warming. St jimmy 11:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

but it was a commie who killed kennedy and it was a commie hoo had nuclear weapons aiming toward america, if lauunched would wipe out the entire US

And the americans had nukes aimed right back at them. St jimmy 13:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

that was after that had them aimed at us it was for protection not destruction


 * And the russians would say the exact same about the Americans. There's no point trying to say one side was right in the cold war. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 09:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

they had weapons on us first


 * But they never used them. You guys dropped two. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 11:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

to end the war they brought us into, ever heard of pearl harbor

nuclear power can be more dangrous than fosils fuels to ever heard of Chernobyl

Pearl Harbour was Japan. And nuclear power is safe. Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island were the only meltdowns in the history of nuclear power. And it doesn't cause global warming. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 11:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

so wat it causes mutation and cancer, and wat does the japan thing mean, i no it was ja[an im just saying we used them to end the war thay brought us into--Andy 23:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

People who live over granite actually recieve a higher dose of radiation than those living near a nuclear plant.

And about the japan thing. They didn't need to blow up two cities to end the war, they were winning anyway. They dropped those bombs to punish Japan so that no one would ever defy america again. And it's a war crime. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 11:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

its not our fault to want to protect our country and make sure something that horrible never happens again, and if we start puuting nuclear power plants every where than that would be our last generation because it would make everyone sterile, fossil fuels dont do that do they, no


 * Neither do nuclear plants. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 10:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * ya they do--Andy 20:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * They may cause a slight drop in fertility but they don't make ppl sterile. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 11:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * prolonged exposure does and a lot nore nuclear power plants will overexpose a lot more people, esp. the ones that work there--Andy 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

You'd swear that they just put a lump of uranium out in the open for people to come along and get exposed. They don't. It's all done in a way that minimises the public's exposure. Like i said before people who live over granite actually recieve a higher dose of radiation than those living near a nuclear plant. And the people who work there aren't forced to work their. They are paid. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 22:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Ever heard of three mile island of Chernobyl, and i dont think that thing about granite is true,=, i want proof--<font color="Red">The<font color="Blue">Nation 23:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

It's to do with radon which forms in granite areas. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 09:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for Fauna (animals), this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 09:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Signature
How do you change your signature. (Ie what happens when you type ~ ) i've seen some ppl with really cool ones like Siva1979 above. St jimmy 13:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The process is documented at WP:SIG, hope you find it useful, and get a nice readable sig ;) --NigelJ talk 13:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Just testing <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy

Communism
Just thought I'd explain about the communism thing. I posted a Communist infobox because I agree with the Communist ideal: "each man takes what he needs and contributes what he can" or something like that.

That does not mean that I agree with what happened in Russia which essentially became a dictatorship. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 14:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for 20th century music, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. PDXblazers 02:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Energy portal
Hi! As a contributor to WikiProject Energy development, I thought you might like to be aware of the opportunity to contribute to the new Energy Portal, now that there is one... No need to reply. Gralo 17:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Good On You
Good on you St Jimmy, I tend to agree with your views and ideas. If there was more people like you in the world, it would be a much better place. Sticking up for other religions, races and beliefs, and what you stand and don't stand for on your talk page. The Anonymous User 23:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. There's nothing I hate more then people who don't respect other people's ideas. <font color="Red" style="font-size: 8pt" face="arial"><font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">S t. <font style="font-size: 10pt" color="black">J immy 21:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member. WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond. This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well. Rock on. --<font color="#000000"> Reaper <font color="#ff0000"> X  02:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Energy portal & future selected articles
Hi! Over the past couple of months I've been spending much more time than I should developing the Energy portal, and intend asking for a portal peer review within the next day or so. The portal provides a showcase for energy-related articles on Wikipedia. One of the most prominent ways is via a the selected article that is currently changed every 6 weeks or so. It would be good to increase this turnover, and with three Wikiprojects dedicated to energy-related topics and a good number of articles already written, I'd like to suggest that members of each Wikiproject might like to use the 'selected article' to feature some of their best work. With this in mind, I'd like to suggest that your Wikiproject bypasses the normal selected article nomination page and decides collectively which articles are worth featuring - or these may be self-evident from previous discussions - and add short 'introduction' to the selected article at the appropriate place on page Portal:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, which includes further information. Your personal involvement would be welcome! Please make any comments on your Wikiproject talk page, my talk page, or on Portal talk:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, as appropriate. Gralo 15:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject
Dear St jimmy:
 * I invite you to join and aid the WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers, in our fight to provide complete and thorough knowledge of the Red Hot Chili Peppers; whether it be a few minor details or a complete revamp of an entire article. We aim to improve the quality and encyclopedic coverage on all articles within relation to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. The article's current state is improving drastically, and, with more widespread attention, GA status, for both the main page and John Frusciante is not far away. Thanks for considering,


 * Regards,
 * <font color="#000000">N <font color="#AF1E2D">SR <font color="#000000">77 (<font color="#AF1E2D">Talk 01:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music and sources
As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 08:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Please help improve Plug-in hybrid
You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Energy development, so I am asking you to please consider helping to improve the plug-in hybrid article. This is an ad hoc article improvement drive. BenB4 08:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
Delivered by CloudNine 19:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers Newsletter Vol. 1, no. 2
The Second Red Hot Chili Peppers Newsletter has been published. Some interesting things have happened in the Wikipedia world of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, so please take the time to read and review any information. Thanks for being apart of the team! Regards, <font color="#000000">N <font color="#AF1E2D">SR <font color="#000000">77 (<font color="#AF1E2D">Talk 02:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Can't Stop
I wouldn't say the article needs serious work. It was failed due to one or two grammatical/sentence errors, and a few missing references. I'm going to fix the problems this weekend when I have free time and will ask for reevaluation. Regards, <font color="#000000">N <font color="#AF1E2D">SR <font color="#000000">77 (<font color="#AF1E2D">Talk 21:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
Delivered by CloudNine 11:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music June 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC).

RHCP COTW
I had closed the COTW as there was little activity; however, there seems to be more of a presence as of now. Do you wish to re-open it? <font color="#000000">NSR <font color="#26466D ">77 <font color="#000000">T<font color="#26466D ">C  02:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC).

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music August 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Alternative music September 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Xihix 23:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Alternative music October 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix  (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Alternative music November 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix  (talk) 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix  (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:American Nervoso.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:American Nervoso.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music January 2008 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix  (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC).

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:American Nervoso.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:American Nervoso.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music Newsletters
If you missed last the previous newsletter, you can find it at WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/February 2008. You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 09:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 09:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)