User talk:Automotivado

Unspecified source for Image:Alexis_Rivera.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alexis_Rivera.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Estadio Juan Ramón Loubriel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Estadio Juan Ramón Loubriel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:La gran casa.JPG listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:La gran casa.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self-no-disclaimers to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Puerto Rico Islanders2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Puerto Rico Islanders2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Puerto Rico Islanders2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Puerto Rico Islanders2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alexis Rivera.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alexis Rivera.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. βcommand 22:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Justin Myers
Per your removal of the prod on this article, could you provide some evidence that the Puerto Rico Soccer League is a fully professional league? Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  21:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Not sure if you missed this - could you let me know if you have any proof of the PRSL being fully pro. If not, I'll take the article to AfD. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  08:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Soccer in Puerto Rico
Hello, I see that you are a futból follower, some of our articles about Puerto Rican soccer are in need of references and perhaps you could help me push a few over the good article line. More importantly we need to expand Association football in Puerto Rico, as well as add reliable sources to it, if you don't understand the format of reference's template, I can always fix it if external links are provided. As a sidenote, perhaps you may be interested in joining WikiProject Puerto Rico, a organized effort to improve articles related to Puerto Rico, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  23:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * For books we generally use Template:Cite book, although I must admit that using that template can be annoying even for established users. If you have the books I recomment adding the material noting the number of the page used to reference it after the important sentences, for example "Association football was introduced to Puerto Rico in [random year].(p.100)" as long as you have the book's title and author, I can work with the format of the references once the material is added. If a page's name is mispelled, moving it is as simple as clicking the "move" tab found at the top of each article (between "history" and "watch") and filling a small form to complete the action. There are some cases where you may want to move an article, but the destination wanted is already being used, in such cases you will need the help of an administrator to complete it, there are five of them in WikiProject Puerto Rico, including me. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  20:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Rico Islanders
You have a very, very nice article! Tony the Marine (talk) 19:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter
Addbot (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Rico Islanders
I bet that you are having the time of you life, aren't you? Defeating two multi-champions and winning the Commissioner's Cup in less than a month, that's really a great feat for such a young team. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Banderas
Hello, in light of recent discoveries, I am proposing a consensus concerning the colors of the flag of Puerto Rico in neutral articles. Please see the project's talk page for further detail. Thanks for your time. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  22:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Titles
There is a tab at the top of each page that says "move", if you press there it will send you to a formula for renaming the article. Some move targets might be blocked by an existing article, if that is the case contact me or any other admin to move it for you. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  23:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year III - Issue 1 - Fall & Winter 2008-09
Addbot (talk) 20:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

PR Islanders - Injury symbols
Hi. The reason I took out the injury symbols is because they shouldn't be used at all. There was a long discussion on WP:FOOTY (which unfortunately I can't find) which eventually decided that symbols which indicate when a player is injured should not be used, because it's almost impossible to manage - players become injured, and recover from injury, so quickly, it was felt it was impractical to try to use them. It's not like they do in baseball, or American football, where teams have formal "injured lists". So, my recommendation would be not to use them at all. Hope this helps! --JonBroxton (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

PR Islanders Current Season
I didn't take anything out. I changed it from 2008 to 2009, and indicated that the 2009 season was in progress. That's all --JonBroxton (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh. I made a mistake with that. Sorry! --JonBroxton (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Islanders article
Sure, I'll take a look. If I make any changes it will mostly be to grammar/spelling, and that kind of stuff, making it read properly. I won't change any of the actual info. --JonBroxton (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I will take a look once Luis Muñoz Marín's review is done, but my suggestions will focus on content, not grammar or wording. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That took quite some time, but I will be able to fully attend this article now. As preliminary notes, the lead needs some detail about the team's USL performance (CONCACAF should be mentioned there as well) and about the other franchise teams. I believe that we could merge "Islanders C" into "Academy", since the article states that the squad is actually part of the academy. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sevilla FC Puerto Rico.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Sevilla FC Puerto Rico.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Automotivado! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Isaac Nieves Rivera -

Islanders
You're welcome! I'm currently working on every MLS, USSSFD2, USL2, PDL and NPSL page, and every pro player in the USA - so it's nice to get some kudos :) Cheers! --JonBroxton (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think there's anything you can do. My suggestion would be to just add it without a minute number, and then keep checking back on the USL, USSF and individual team's websites, until the numbers are published. There's no harm in not showing the number until you get a correct source. --JonBroxton (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven Beattie


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RDN1F (don&#39;t) (talk) (to) (me) (before) (my) (coffee) (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Mesa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Mesa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin Mesa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Mesa


A tag has been placed on Kevin Mesa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steven Beattie


The article Steven Beattie has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Steven Beattie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Beattie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steven Beattie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sevilla FC Bayamón squad
Template:Sevilla FC Bayamón squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Orange Star Ultras.jpg


The file File:Orange Star Ultras.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused image, uploaded Nov 2008. According to TinEye, it was already found on another website in Apr 2008. This makes the 'own work' claim doubtful."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)