User talk:Autum Davis

Nomination of Morris–Putnam point for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morris–Putnam point is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Morris–Putnam point until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Morris–Putnam point


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Morris–Putnam point, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The contribs history (thankfully preserved at archive.org for us non-sysops) is very symptomatic of many editors’ tendency to unquestioningly accept obvious errors and just carry on with HotCat or at best a Cn tag. I have spoken. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)