User talk:AvaBrandon2000

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lalla Fatima Zohra has been reverted. Your edit here to Lalla Fatima Zohra was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.royalark.net/Morocco/morocco9.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Khnata bent Bakkar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Rashid of Morocco, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saadi, Fez and Moroccan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Rashid of Morocco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco
Hi,

In your recent edit to this article, when you "fixed" the language tag, you did the opposite. The proper language tag for English is en. When there is an two letter ISO-693-1 code, that's the proper code to use, not the ISO-693-3 code. Take a look at the pages that I mentioned my edit summary subsequent to your edit for details.

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 03:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Linking in articles
Hi AvaBrandon2000, Thank you by the way for your useful contributions to the articles on the 'Alawi dynasty and other Moroccan historical and royal figures. Just a quick note: I noticed that in some of your edits (e.g. this one) you added multiple links to pages that were already linked once or more in the article. Just to let you know that Wikipedia policy is to link to another page only once in the same article, usually in the "first occurrence" in the lead and/or in the text following the lead section (see MOS:LINKONCE for details). So while you're adding material, there's no need to add links a topic if the link already appears earlier in the main text. Of course, duplicate links still happen by accident and it's not a big deal, but hopefully this might save you some unnecessary work in the future! (And save later editors the minor trouble of removing duplicate links during clean-up work.) Thanks again! R Prazeres (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Abu Bakr ibn Umar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 14:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Abu Bakr ibn Umar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Warning
Hi, it has come to my attention that you are stubbornly trying to pinpoint the biological paternity of the children of Isabella II to her husband by pulling revisionist junk. Whether you like it to be or not, the moot biological paternities of Isabella's children are not going to go away because you found a junk source crying that the king consort was their true biological father (which, as I comment later, it is not even the case). Are you doing this because you have only read about it in a junk blog post, or because you are set on wielding that junk source as an argument deliberatedly going against what actually reliable sources account about the topic? Either way, don't do it. Consider that many times, when everybody considers something to be one way but you find somewhere else that "everybody is mistaken" and things were actually some other way, it's more likely you have found a fringe theory. And that's putting aside that not even the source you are bringing explicitly backs up what you are pretending it to assert (it is casting doubt on historiography but, unlike you, it is not even try to prove anything).--Asqueladd (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, yes I staunchly defend the biological paternity of Isabella II' children as belonging to Francisco. And that because I read tones of articles about the dubious claims of the Carlists: who being sexist as refusing a female monarch tried to discredit her in that manner; and the Duke of Montpensier's schemes to discredit Isabella to take the throne and how Francisco her husband was never homosexual. Therefore, I will come with all these previously cited arguments each backed up with citations. The opening argument is that of the reference I previously added from author Nieves Michavilas and I'll probably take some time to reunite all citations to have in all: the solid argument that give paternity back to Francisco. Because as Michavilas said, current authors tend to follow the post 1868 putsch narrative without second doubt.--AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2022‎ (UTC)
 * Well, you are not in a position to impose your "staunch" personal position as "something factual" trumping over historiography and going to the point of misrepresenting "sources" that are not actually "usable" for Wikipedia to begin with. Period. If you think so, you are sorely misguided about what this site is.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Verb tense
Please make sure to always use past tense for historical events and not present tense as at Zaynab bent Youssef. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammed ben Abdallah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 You have been blocked for two weeks from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * You engaged in a profane and highly personalized attack against another editor. That is unacceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yahya Ibn Ibrahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abu Bakr ibn Umar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hi AvaBrandon2000! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @R Prazeres. Sure, I'll be more careful on that. AvaBrandon2000 (talk) AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove references without giving a reason. Tacyarg (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @Tacyarg ! Actually my reason for removing was that these references are already in the text. It's nicer to have the infobox without refs and all added in text, it makes it prettier. It also leaves a more sorted Reference List at the end of the page. Don't worry I've found those references, it's only after having made solid written additions in the text about her wedding and especially her divorce, that I removed those refs from the infobox to leave them only in the text.AvaBrandon2000 (talk) AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Lalla Asma of Morocco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Regarding Moulay Ismail
Hello. Im aware that your recent huge updates of Ismail ibn Sharif Article. Perhaps you could share more non english source u knoe regarding Sultan Ismail biography? I think this article have potency to reach GA status 139.193.50.17 (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lalla Sitt al-Mulk


A tag has been placed on Lalla Sitt al-Mulk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)