User talk:Avahlanche/sandbox

Peer Review
I thought overall that your draft was well written. I think that the draft could use more of a neutral tone instead of an essay tone. In my opinion, I would change the phrases such as, "very prevalent", "far less access", and possibly removing the word "only" before the sentence that states: "only 10% of these households have one internet user", to make the draft seem less essay like. Other than the tone of your draft, I think it is well written and you cited all of your information.Apurse2 (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Good job keeping the information neutral and concise. One part that kind of confused me and I had to reread was "only 10% of these households have one internet user.[1]." It may sound a little better as "and 10% of these households have only one internet user." Also, I believe regional should be regionally. Other than that, wonderful job including the statistics and comparing it to other countries that are more developed. Mbeach5 (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Abigail's Response to Peer Review
I agree that my part of the article needs to be written in less of an essay tone. I also need to fix my references and how I made them. Some of the divisions needs to be removed and all of the work should be blended together to make everything flow better. AbigailCrowther (talk) 04:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
I found it a little wordy. Try getting straight to point. If you feel you must have all the percentages, try to explain them more simply after. Maybe add reasons to why women are using the internet more frequently than men. Alacombe19 (talk) 03:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)AllysonAlacombe19 (talk) 03:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)