User talk:Avajar20/sandbox

Reviewing for Avajar20

Relevance: I am not sure if so much of the history behind the discovery of the phenomenon is necessary.

Distracting: I found the amount of history about the discovery of the phenomenon to be a tad distracting.

Neutrality: The article appears to be neutral.

Viewpoints over / under represented: The article uses evolution and nature / vs nature to explain the phenomenon, both viewpoints are represented well.

Citations: Not all links appear to be working

Facts cited well: There are numerous facts not cited. The entire paragraph concerning operant conditioning is not cited at all. This article needs many citations added.

Out of date info: Nothing appears to be out of date or no longer relevant