User talk:Avalaramesh

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Avalaramesh


A tag has been placed on User:Avalaramesh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 10:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
[] [] Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Think!. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Gsyhiap (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Both your user page and content you added to this talk page have been removed. None of the content was related to contributing to the encyclopaedia, much of it was copied from other sources (apparently in violation of copyright) and at least some of it appeared to be intended for promotion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because you have been using Wikipedia for inappropriate purposes. You have been using Wikipedia to promote or advertise, despite being told this is unacceptable. You have copied material here from elsewhere, without giving any indication that this is not infringing copyright. You have persistently used this talk page to hold material unrelated to editing the encyclopaedia, apparently for your own use. There has never been any evidence that you have any intention of doing anything else. The purpose of editing Wikipedia is to contribute to the encyclopaedia, and other uses are not acceptable. Wikipedia is not a free web host, and may not be used to hold material unrelated to working on the encyclopaedia. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Note: Despite the fact that you have been blocked, you are still able to edit this talk page, in order to allow you to request an unblock if appropriate. However, please do not continue to use this talk page for other purposes: doing so may lead to talk page access being removed.JamesBWatson (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)