User talk:Avashurov

Welcome
Hi Jeraphine Gryphon. Please help me understand why did you remove 85% of neutral, valid and sourced information and replaced it with hardly sources one. What were your disagreement with The Zeitgeist Movement page? Avashurov (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

According to WP:ABOUTSELF, self-published sources are fully qualified for describing own internal structure and activities. Avashurov (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest you take your concerns to Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement and discuss these content issue with Jeraphine Gryphon there. Shearonink (talk) 03:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Reception section
I've started a new discussion on the talk page about the discussion section. Rather that end up in an edit war, please discuss the changes there. Ravensfire ( talk ) 19:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Your recent editing history at The Zeitgeist Movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tikiwont (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)