User talk:Avatar

List of warez groups on VfD
Please see Votes for deletion/List of warez groups for an ongoing discussion regarding the potential deletion of the List of warez groups article. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 00:52, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

logwood isn't being maintained and doesn't work properly. someone needs to do some work to fix it before it comes back. kate.

My RFA
Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again! ALKIVAR &trade; 07:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Inkblot.gif
You wrote:
 * Hi DreamGuy, can you give source and author information about the pic? Thanks a lot! --Avatar-en 07:28, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

... The card comes from the inkblot test, but made solid tone instead of in the original grayscale. What do you mean author information? Rorschech inkblot test card, coverted by me, public domain, nothing else is needed. Do you not understand how public domain works? DreamGuy 23:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. Please take a look at Image copyright tags. It's hard to verify the claim of public domain, without data to verify it. I appended some info to the picture description. --Avatar-en 07:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

.

List of social networking websites
Hi. Please go back to the List of social networking websites and re-add an amended reference to Xing's updated figures. The URL you added was incorrect, and visitors clicking the link were taken to a page which did not show the new usercount. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) (eds) 18:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hm. Thanks for the info. Well - the link works for me, but not for MediaWiki. Most probably the brackets are the problem. --Avatar 13:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

News on Flagged Revs?
I have taken your name in vain at the Signpost tip line, I hope you don't mind. I'm sure I am not the only one eager to hear how things are progressing with Flagged Revisions. By "regular updates" I meant something like every two or three weeks at first, slowing down or stopping when the system settles down. PaddyLeahy (talk) 01:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll try to give some meaningful updates in the future. --Avatar (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Poll on de.wiki regarding flagged revisions
Hello Avatar. From the poll on de.wiki I've gleaned the following counts of opinions. Can you tell me if I at least got the headings correct?


 * Pro: 75 comments


 * Contra: 113 comments


 * Don't know/Can't decide: 2 comments


 * I decline to debate this question: 21 comments


 * I endorse this inquiry: 7 comments


 * I decline to even consider whether this question is meaningful or not: 7 comments

For my next foray into the German language, I'm hoping to figure out the major points that each group is trying to make!

Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Your translation is accurate. "Gut gemacht!". Personal remark: I don't think that this poll is very accurate itself. Many temporary polls were created about the stable versions and many people got tired of answering those. Many advocates of the idea and 'normal' users haven't signed this poll (but I have to admit, there are a few well known editors on the contra side). --Avatar (talk) 04:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

0.7
Tim, if you get a chance, please skim WT:MOS, which is about Version 0.7, aimed at recent questions from style people. In particular, I'd love to talk more with you some time about ComCom's view, and I'll be talking with Raul654 too. The No. 1 concern about Version 0.7 among my wikicolleagues is that it might harm Wikipedia's image. My feeling is that that's ComCom's area of expertise and concern, and that having ComCom weigh in on this will go a long way towards defining the problem and reducing anxieties. (Feel free to respond here or anywhere, or not at all.) - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 14:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evoke (demo party)


The article Evoke (demo party) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An unreferenced article since 2005.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)