User talk:Avatar9n

Welcome
Hello, Avatar9n, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:18, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Disruptive editing by user Gunnai?
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Disruptive editing by user Gunnai?". Thank you.

February 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:MP7A1 suppressor and red dot.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. When you recently edited 5.6×52mmR, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mm and Gr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

List
Parade Magazine is a reliable source. Its wikipedia page says its the most widely read magazine in the U.S., with a circulation of 32.2 million and a readership of nearly 70 million. --58.165.38.201 (talk) 06:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Last Change
The last change you have made in List of Modern Dictators should be discussed in talk page, because there are number of editors now, who are only editing it back to the page which they preferred. Thanks Clarificationgiven (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Use of warning templates
This is an inappropriate use of warning templates, as the edits in question did not constitute vandalism. I suggest you read WP:NOT VANDALISM before issuing any further warnings. Cheers! Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 03:52, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

List of modern dictators
Avatar, your recent reversion of my removal of Lee Kuan Yew's entry on the List of modern dictators has been reverted. Please do not do it again as this currently stands in violation of our biographies of living persons' policy. Edits perceived to be defamatory will be reverted at sight. Furthermore, please leave edit summaries while making changes to article pages. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 02:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me seriously, why Chinese Communist leader Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin, Soviet communist leaders Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev, Cuban President Raul Castro, Argentina military junta leader Jorge Rafael Videla, Roberto Eduardo Viola, Leopoldo Galtieri, Reynaldo Bignone, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat are not dictators???????Marxistfounder (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Because people don't be dictators because of the fact you called them dictators. Vladimir Lenin, Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev were obviously not dictators. Stalin was, and i didn't revert it. Go and find another stuff to play. - Avatar 896 13:18, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Argentina military junta leader Jorge Rafael Videla, Roberto Eduardo Viola, Leopoldo Galtieri, Reynaldo Bignone, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat are not dictators????????????????Marxistfounder (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Go ahead, add their names and show no mercy. - Avatar 896 10:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Aren't you a vandal yourself?
[|Reverting constructional contributions], huh? And that's not the first time --≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.206.10 (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no need to add socialism beside juche. - Avatar 896 20:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Heckler & Koch MP7. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Image size in the infobox of weapons related articles should be 300 px. Thomas.W (talk) 12:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Intermediate Cartrige
Facts are dependent upon figures and statistics, not popular opinion. Argumentem ad Populatum is NOT a valid debate tactic.Staygyro (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Enough energy to be categorized as intermediate cartridge by who or what? and by what standards? Popular arguement is NOT a valid debate tactic. The assertion simply isn't true. Look at the page on Taylor KO Factor. Have you done TKO calculations for these munitions? and compared them to GENUINE intermediate munitions?Staygyro (talk) 12:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * For one, There are several ways of measuring stopping power, such as momentum and KE, but these do not consider the importance of bore diameter, which is very important in stopping power, so that makes the TKO the best formula there is for measuring stopping power. Other formulae, Thorniley Factor and the Hatcher Factor, all of which factors in the bore, the velocity and the mass of the bullet, all lead to similar results with regards to the topic discussed, i.e. the fact that the 5.56x45mm, 5.45x39mm and the 5.8x42mm have similar values to each other, but markedly different to REAL immediate rounds like the 7.62x39mm, the 6.8mm SPC, the 7.92 Kurz, the .280 British and the Japanese 6.5mm Arisaka.
 * For two, where is the source or figures to support the "popular assertion"? Staygyro (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Dictatorship page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=703143900 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F703143900%7CDictatorship%5D%5D Ask for help])

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at T-72, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The Globalsecurity source does not say what your edit says, and the Russian source has nothing to do with this, and could possibly even be seen as a fake source... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at T-72 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 16:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at T-72
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
 * Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:

Fixed signature:

More information is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures or respond here. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)