User talk:Avecchione

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Latr, Katr 16:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your questions
I replied to you on my talk page, thanks! 19:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, I hope at some point you will respond to my questions. Thanks again. Latr, Katr 17:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Idaho State Historical Society
I noticed you seem to be involved in Idaho State Historical Society, and are adding links to that site. I have just opened a case on our Spam wikiproject on this subject: WT:WPSPAM. I hope you can help us discuss the subject. --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Answer
Hi. Don't worry, it is just that we want a clarification. One of your collegues (according to the staff-list of the site you work for) was adding links to one specific site (not this one), and recieved a couple of warnings (which unfortunately all got ignored). When I checked his further edits I saw this small group of accounts which had some things in common. I am sorry, but lately there have been some cases of massive link-additions to musea/libraries etc., which may have been against policy/guideline, and therefore I choose to discuss early on.

We were all (once) new here, and had to learn. I understand that you want to help the wikipedia, and working for an historical site. That means that you have access to a lot of (valuable) information, and I am sure Wikipedia can use that to its advantage!

But, we are writing an encyclopedia here. That means that it is mainly content that we are interested in. Not in external links only. Furthermore (and that is linked in the welcome message above), we have some policies and guidelines, some of which are very important (the five pillars).

In this case, policies and guidelines of interest are:
 * WP:NOT - policy, what wikipedia is not. In this case, the section WP:NOT is of interest.
 * WP:EL - guideline on external links.
 * WP:COI - guideline on conflict of interest.
 * WP:RS - what Wikipedia regards as a reliable source (which, most probably, would include your site)

And to a lesser extend:
 * WP:SPAM - guideline, what Wikipedia regards spam (there is a section 'how not to be a spammer' which may be of interest).

Some other guidelines:
 * WP:CITE - citation system
 * WP:FOOT - how to create citations

All of these are derived from the 5 pillars I named above.

So in short, if your main target is to add content which improves Wikipedia (and I am sure it is), using reliable sources as citations (which can include links to your site, but, keeping a neutral point of view, also to other sites), then there are no problems. I hope this explains, and if you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask. --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much. I did as much research as I felt that I possibly could before we decided to jump in and add information. There seem to be more rules on wikipedia than I could have even imagined. I wasn't expected to be affronted by people who call themselves wikicops, and I didn't even know there was such a thing. I'm a young librarian. I want to add content. I want people to get access to information. All I want is people to get access to information.

I really do appreciate the insights, and I will try to read as much as humanly possible next week while most people are on vacation.

Best, Truly,

Avecchione 21:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Amy
 * Thanks for the reply. There is a whole mechanism behind wikipedia where people are monitoring edits and link additions (of course mainly to catch resp. vandalism and spam).  You got caught a bit in a cross-fire because of a collegue who added links to a site which was under monitor by one of our automated accounts (my 'bot', actually, user:COIBot).  Hope to see you around, happy editing, and have a nice day!  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 21:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I hope I'm not the "wikicop" to whom you are referring. That's sort of a joke between me and some of the other editors of WikiProject Oregon. I can explain more about that if you want to know. I did answer your questions, but with all the traffic on this page, I'm not sure you saw my link to my response or if you know about watching my talk page for my response. And I apologize if you detected any hostility in my answer or anything like that. To clarify, since I think I understand your questions better, like I say on my talk page, I keep all the articles about Oregon cities on my watchlist. I put that up front on my talk page because that's what I do a lot of. I'm under no obiligation to say that, but it's nice for editors to talk a little bit about themselves. I happen to keep a bunch of other Oregon-related things on my watchlist too, as I am one of the main contributors to WikiProject Oregon. I don't, as a rule, keep "every single" one of anything else on my watchlist, such as Idaho, but WikiProject Oregon does have some tools for monitoring all the articles that are related to that project, which I use from time to time. (If you're interested in knowing more about that, let me know). As I state on my talkpage, I don't do this for any other reason except to make sure the Oregon articles are the best that they can be. If I had any other motivation, surely I would have been blocked by now. As it is, I have over 18,000 edits and a very positive track record, as evidenced by some of the barnstars people have given me. Not that I like bragging about myself, but I'm just trying to explain that I'm not some random editor who is trying to give you a hard time. Be sure to ask me if you have any other questions. It looks like Beetstra has been an enormous help though. Take care, Latr, Katr 21:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm actually not interested in knowing any more about you calling yourself a wikicop.


 * Alrighty then. I've tried to welcome you and be helpful, but I guess I'm coming across all wrong. I'll leave you with a couple more links to guidelines that might be helpful and promise I'll never edit articles about Idaho again. See Assume Good Faith and Civility. Happy editing! Latr, Katr 16:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Idaho articles
I work on the Idaho Wikiproject. I am actually very interested in the concept of integrating articles with NWDA. I work at Washington State University Library in Pullman, which is also part of NWDA. I am sensing confusion on the part of some administrators on Wikipedia about links to outside sources. The argument about Conflict of Interest is interesting, except that our whole existence in libraries is based on providing access to information. I certainly hope the abrupt actions of some admins doesn't discourage you. I would like to work with you and TGarrick to add content to existing articles using the resources at the historical society. If we can take this to the Talk:Old Idaho State Penitentiary, maybe we can work out a way to add value to the article and not trigger a Spam alert. I will contact TGarrick as well. --Robbie Giles 00:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Alexander Rossi, assayer
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alexander Rossi, assayer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alexander Rossi, assayer seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alexander Rossi, assayer, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Mining in Idaho -- possible copyright vio
Hi -- I tagged Mining in Idaho with possible copyright vio, because it appears at least some of its text is copied from the one source given in the article, which appears not to be in the public domain. Hopefully you can address this by editing the article or by noting how I may be mistaken. sincerely, doncram (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LogoISHS.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:LogoISHS.JPG, which you've sourced to Idaho State Historical Society. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Logosmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logosmall.jpg, which you've sourced to Idaho State Historical Society. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Smelters.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Smelters.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of E. L. "Shorty" Fuller for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E. L. "Shorty" Fuller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/E. L. "Shorty" Fuller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)