User talk:Avenginghonesty

February 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

He is a murderer. Period. The quantifier should be noted. Simply saying, read rest of sentence is ludicrous,  because then it can be argued that it doesn't need to be noted he is an activist either since there are plenty of quantifying statements to that. To not add that in the information introduction is the same as introducing an article about Ted Bundy as a "American Former Law Student". Either strictly, unbiased, unpoliticatical facts should be stated or it is all together false and revised lies. Avenginghonesty (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Have you actually read the sentence you are changing? Specifically, the meaning of the words after "activist"? FDW777 (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Are you actually reading the article? Avenginghonesty (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Why notated activist and not murderer in the first part of the subject sentence? As any reputable article would. It really is that simple. Avenginghonesty (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It's good you finally admit the sentence already includes the information you were trying to add. I suggest you propose any changes to that sentence you would like to make at Talk:David Gilbert (activist). FDW777 (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)