User talk:Avento55

Proposed deletion of AJ Atencio
Hello, Avento55. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, AJ Atencio, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want AJ Atencio to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Pam  D  20:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC) I see several references added and I just put another one next to his name for review. (Avento55 (talk) 20:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC))

New references added for this page including LA Times and smart voter. Highly reputable sources. (Avento55 (talk) 18:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC))

Nomination of AJ Atencio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AJ Atencio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AJ Atencio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  07:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

""Avento55"" New references added for this page including LA Times and smart voter. Highly reputable sources.  Please provide on what else is needed as this is my first page creation and I'd like to keep it running.([[User:Avento55|Avento55 (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC))


 * You need to discuss the article at the AfD discussion, not on this talk page. But an LA Times article showing that AJ ran unsuccessfully for a local council election does not contribute to their being notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Pam  D  20:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * That LA Times link is just one of about a dozen sources distinguishing AJ. (Avento55 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC))

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with AJ Atencio. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Pam D  13:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I posted a question on you page without answer. I edited the page yesterday and provided many links to source AJ.  (Avento55 (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC))
 * In response to your question I looked at the page and concluded that none of the sources appeared to refer to AJ Atencio in person, except for a mention in Reddit which is not a Reliable Source, so I nominated it for deletion. Please stop removing the deletion template - read the words, which tell you not to do so. If you believe that the article should not be deleted, argue the case at the deletion discussion here.  Pam  D  14:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to AJ Atencio, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MRD2014 T C 14:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with AJ Atencio. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Pam D  14:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

I made the changes and wiki says if changes are made that satisfy the area in issue, I can save the page. The first two sources are from the las vegas review journal. One of the biggest newspapers in the USA. Both clearly mention aj atencio and that's only the first two links here. Are you taking the time to review? Thanks for your help on getting it right. (Avento55 (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at AJ Atencio, you may be blocked from editing. JudgeRM  (talk to me)  14:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Multiple accounts blocked
Hi. There is checkuser evidence that you are also the creator of the accounts Paininthegain, JamesSPR and Hollywoodtruelove, and that you used the first two of those to !vote multiple times in a discussion on an article for deletion (AfD). It's also clear from reading the comments at the AfD that you did this deliberately, to create the false impression of strong support for the article. I've now blocked the alternative accounts. You may have noticed I have not blocked this one, because I'd like to assume you won't do it again. But before you resume editing, please read and adhere to the relevant policy on this topic.

Happy to discuss if required. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)