User talk:Avenue X at Cicero/Archive 1

Cleanup Tag removal
Hello. Please do not remove cleanup notice tags from articles. They are intended to alert other users that the article in question is in need of attention. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry! As I was fairly new to Wikipedia I didn't thoroughly know the rules! GaneshBhakt (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Shyam Sunderji Surolia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shyam Sunderji Surolia. Since you had some involvement with the Shyam Sunderji Surolia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry! It was a mistake! It was actually my first article move and I was amazed that I could move articles! Instead, I should have tried it in my sandbox! GaneshBhakt (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shyam Sunder Surolia


The article Shyam Sunder Surolia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The article should not be deleted as sadly it is not a Biography of a living person. So the very, proposition is bogus. GaneshBhakt (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of L. D. Lobo


A tag has been placed on L. D. Lobo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 11:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The article may be deleted once it is merged. GaneshBhakt (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Signature of Sting.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Sting.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Signature of Pablo Picasso.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Pablo Picasso.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Signature of Elvis Presley.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Elvis Presley.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Signature of Br. L. D. Lobo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Br. L. D. Lobo.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Signature of Priyanka Chopra.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Signature of Priyanka Chopra.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Prajwal  talk  13:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Unlisted, dispute resolved, vector version provided by me, prefered over jpg file provided by Prajwal . GaneshBhakt (talk) 16:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * . Deletion propostition is bogus. Wiki has a policy supporting vector images File kept. GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Signature of Priyanka Chopra.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Signature of Priyanka Chopra.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Prajwal  talk  14:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

The file uploaded by you is a redundant copy. Prajwal  talk  14:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * @ Prajwal the copy uploaded by me is not a redundant copy,  as all pixels are changed or improved or scaled up, the image is in another, better, effective, and smaller file format, which is on Commons. As I have already scrapped your bogus allegations, I did not even consider participating in the discussion. GaneshBhakt (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Untagged, dispute resolved, vector version provided by me, prefered over jpg file provided by Prajwal . GaneshBhakt (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * . Deletion propostition is bogus. Wiki has a policy supporting vector images File kept. GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello GaneshBhakt,

You have requested adoption by an experienced user on your user page. If you have no objections, I can be your mentor till you feel the need. Please indicate your acceptance. Regards,  Yes Michael? •Talk 12:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Would be me pleasure! Been waitin' for this moment! GaneshBhakt (talk) 13:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent! Glad to have you here. What articles do you plan to work on?  Yes Michael? •Talk 16:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Would be me pleasure! GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to West Bengal legislative assembly election, 2011. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 07:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please dont upload copyvio images in wikimedia project - Jayanta Nath (Talk 07:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Mamata Banerjee, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 07:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * How and why do these images violate copyright? GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Let me answer that. Wikipedia requires that the files be published under a free license. See the Image use policy for more information.  Yes Michael? •Talk 07:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * In effect, the images should be in the public domain, or under a suitable copyleft license. The images that you have added seem to be from Google Images, most of which, unfortunately are not reuseable.  Yes Michael? •Talk 07:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I know that. But Mike, there was no suitable copyright statement on the site barring us from reusing the image. Otherwise I could've uploaded this image from here, but there is a clear statement saying All Rights Reserved. GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It is safe to assume that if there is no copyright status mentioned, then it is copyrighted. I'm not the best guy in images really, but commons has a strict policy with images. Make sure to use images which are only labelled as reusable for commercial purposes. It will have CC-BY-SA-NC 3.0 if i'm not wrong; or something like that explicitly mentioned.  Yes Michael? •Talk 08:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Small correction: CC-BY-SA-NC would be inappropriate, because that's just the one that restricts commercial re-use. CC-BY-SA and some other variants are okay. Apart from that, MikeLynch is correct: the presence or absence of a copyright mark makes no difference. Things are assumed copyrighted unless there's proof to the contrary, not the other way round. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:MamataDidi.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:MamataDidi.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://topnews.in/law/files/Mamata-bannerjee11.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.topnews.in/law/mamata-stormy-petrel-matures-chief-ministerinwaiting-219071&h=350&w=272&sz=21&tbnid=ebz6Zxeu9hZjYM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=93&prev=/search%3Fq%3DMamata%2Bbannerjee%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=Mamata+bannerjee&usg=__qafKAKTHeTs7JclEjnNcDZ6PJmo=&sa=X&ei=-gW9TYeDDsbqrQeWv5SCDA&ved=0CD8Q9QEwAw. As a copyright violation, File:MamataDidi.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:MamataDidi.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:MamataDidi.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:MamataDidi.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:MamataDidi.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 07:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * First up, I wasn't aware this image existed on Google. Second, where in Top News Law is a copyright statement written? GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard discussion
Please see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Archives/741. You certainly don't own any of those signatures, so the own template is inappropriate. Please engage with the discussion there about the appropriate licenses and use of images of signatures. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Please dont remove free images from West Bengal state assembly election, 2011 and adding copyrighted images.Look and try to obey the messages at User talk:MikeLynch Next time time If you doing that I have to inform in WP:ANI. Thank you.-- - Jayanta Nath (Talk 04:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 04:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Hmm...
Why did you yesterday upload a non-free image (File:BuddhadebBhattacharjee.jpg) of this poltician, claiming it was unreplaceable, when today you suddenly remember you once sat opposite this same prominent guy in an armchair in somebody's living-room (File:BuddhadebBabu.jpg), and you once stood right next to him while watching a parade (File:BuddhoBabu.jpg), and you actually had your own private photographs from these two lucky moments? Can you see why this might make me suspect these two photos aren't actually yours, and you just made up the "own work" claim to sneak them in and avoid deletion? If that is the case, please say so now and never try that again, because otherwise, if I should find proof they are in fact somebody else's, you'll be blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * These two were from my personal collection, and I never, never, upload photos from my Personal Collection (except the autographs, o' course). But, this guy forced me to do so. And also it was a tedious task, pulling 'em outh the archive, scan, edit, this, that, this, that, data data data. GaneshBhakt (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear I have no personal problem with you. It is all about Wikipedia policy. And don't understand your comments, These two were from my personal collection, and I never, never, upload photos from my Personal Collection. Before upload anything please read WP:IUP first. Happy editing.--- Jayanta Nath (Talk 12:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * And don't understand your comments, These two were from my personal collection, and I never, never, upload photos from my Personal Collection - What don't you understand from this statement? GaneshBhakt (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt, the absence of camera metadata also seems to indicate that it may be an unfree file. Please come clean on this, or else you may risk being blocked.  Yes Michael? •Talk 14:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, to be fair, if these are indeed from a private archive, they look like scans from a paper print of a non-digital photograph (yes, some people were still using analog cameras until quite recently, hard as that seems to imagine to some today), and in that case they of course wouldn't have exif data. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Totally agree with Fut.Perf. ☼. The only reason it does not have camera metadata is because I didn't have a digital camera back in 2000-01. And also no digital camera was reasonably priced back then in India, let alone the tiny tiny territory of Murshidabad. GaneshBhakt (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing this up .  Yes Michael? •Talk 17:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Look at another file I uploaded, and the metadata. Since I clicked a picture of a finger, all the metadata is shown. GaneshBhakt (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:BuddhadebBabu.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BuddhadebBabu.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --- Jayanta Nath (Talk 14:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It ain't unfree. Mark my words. Don't mess with the wrong guy. You feel me? Jayanta Nath? GaneshBhakt (talk) 17:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I understand. Unlike Jayanta Nath, atleast I should maintain WikiQuette. GaneshBhakt (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:BuddhoBabu.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BuddhoBabu.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --- Jayanta Nath (Talk 14:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It ain't unfree. Mark my words. Don't mess with the wrong guy. You feel me? Jayanta Nath? GaneshBhakt (talk) 17:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please strike out the above sentence. Do not keep anything personal here.  Yes Michael? •Talk 18:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. But he is the one who dug this hole for himself! GaneshBhakt (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I understand. Unlike Jayanta Nath, atleast I should maintain WikiQuette. GaneshBhakt (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If there is really a dispute, there are methods to resolve them. However, I don't want this to go to a formal DR chamber; lets sort it out here. Lets see what Jayanta has to reply.  Yes Michael? •Talk 18:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please be more specific, there is no personal issue. If you stay in India or West Bengal, please joint our any open meetup, where we can discuss. Probably you live in Murshidabad.Because you are very Lucy personal, you had very big opportunity to take great snaps shop at Murshidabad in front of Mr Chief Minister. Please help us and upload some images of  of Mr Chief Minister. I think you had not snaps only one. Please upload you images with Xdata/Metadata of raw file. After that we can move those images to commons or you can directly upload images in commons yourself.  I replied at image discussion.--- Jayanta Nath (Talk 05:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * @Jayantanth, I believe you do have a Samsung Camera. What I would like to ask you is that when did you buy this camera? Was it back in 2000-01? GaneshBhakt (talk) 08:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear GaneshBhakt, for your queries, my Samsung camera was not back 2000, it is in 2009.Thanks. --- Jayanta Nath (Talk 09:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 2009, right? Okay another one, did you have an analog camera before? GaneshBhakt (talk) 09:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand your queries, you took a snapshot of Mr Minister with analog camera at Murshidabad. that's it? And upload a scan copy. oh! dear that's great experience!!! Could you please share some memories with Mr Buddhadeb Bhattacherjee?? --- Jayanta Nath (Talk 09:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I am impressed. That is Proof by Contradiction. Also, I see समझदार को इशारा ही काफी होता है! . GaneshBhakt (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Signature of VJ Rannvijay Singh Singha.svg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Signature of VJ Rannvijay Singh Singha.svg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Forty two  06:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikibreak
Hey, I am on a WP:WIKIBREAK till at least 24 May, due to exams :|. So you can expect little from me till that date. Sorry for any inconvenience caused! See you soon.  Yes Michael? •Talk 12:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shyam Sunder Surolia, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 05:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyright
I just saw this copyright statement. Will we violate copyright if we use images from this site? If not, would you please tell me under which license can we release the photos? GaneshBhakt (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, according to the page you linked, anything produced by that website/organisation is free to be uploaded to Wikipedia. You can probably use the attribution license tag. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * However, note the clause that "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material." That means that if that pib.nic.in publishes pictures that are owned by some other party, those pictures cannot necessarily be reused -- you'd have to go back to the copyright holder of those photos to be sure. —Tim Pierce (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, which is why I said anything produced by them. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 05:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MamataBanerjeePBI-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MamataBanerjeePBI-1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  22:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MamataBanerjeePBI-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MamataBanerjeePBI-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  22:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  22:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MamataBanerjeePBI-3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MamataBanerjeePBI-3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  22:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * GaneshBhakt (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ganesh
It takes a lot of time, to create an article. You are welcome to improve the articles in any way, or the name of the aricles. But it gives lot of pain to the creator when an a genvinly needeed article is deleted. I hope you will understand. Thanks. Mahesh Kumar Yadav     talk 15:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand. :(. But this is Wikipedia, and we have to provide info with an NPOV, well referenced, and without weasel words. Even an article I created, was under severe scrunity, but the article came out a butterfly from its cocoon. If you do not want your article to be deleted, you will have to provide a reasonable explanation as to why and where it should be merged, because these articles do not deserve a seperate article, but a section with a relevant article. I know your articles may be true, but you have to provide sources. And also, why make seperate articles when we can add them to a similar one and improve their quality? Hope you'll understand. GaneshBhakt (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your move request
Hi Ganesh. Generally move requests are placed on the talk page of the article to be moved. So you'll want to move WT:RM to Talk:Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee so the most people can see it. Thanks. –CWenger ( ^ •  @ ) 15:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops! My bad! Sorry! GaneshBhakt (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5.jpg. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Jayanta Nath (Talk 04:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)