User talk:Aveouva092

Welcome!

Hello, Aveouva092, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to India, we hope you'll stay and add content to India related articles. Consider joining or watchlisting India related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for India-related topics). Again, welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page,. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Air India. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 16:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Air India destinations. ''Removing content without explanation, adding flags are the things that need to stop. As mentioned already on my talk page, kindly stop vandalizing pages'' &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 04:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Air India, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello Aveouva092 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Shrikanthv (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Air India destinations
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Air India destinations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! In veritas (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. only (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 17:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at AirAsia Group destinations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 09:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Indira Gandhi International Airport. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  11:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air Zimbabwe. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 19:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air Mauritius. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop doing purposeless edits.
Why do you keep deleting and adding things with no purpose? Do not repeat it else I will report it to admin. Ajaybhal619 (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The user continues with their addition of unsourced content .--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 15:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Curl brackets
Can you please use the curl brackets? Nobody will see your unblock requests if you don't.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Unblock Request!!!
- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this was their first block, I would support, but since it's the fourth one, I'm a bit skeptical. But I won't object either. Your call. Widr
 * I'm of a mind to decline the request. 4 blocks in 11 months, blocked for 4 months and a week of those 11, and the last block almost immediate from the previous 3 month block. This isn't an editor who's here to build an encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine, go ahead and decline RickinBaltimore. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

(talk) 10:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Hi. First off, don't log out to edit. Administrators will review this as time allows. Please be patient; it may take a few days for administrators to discuss your unblock request and determine whether or not you should be unblocked. You're welcome to post in this section, just don't post new unblock request templates. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that Aveouva092 has logged out to message me on my talk page again after the above message telling them not to do so. Adding socking to the list, I believe there's serious competence issues here. I'd recommend returning in a couple years with additional maturity/experience. ~ Rob 13 Talk 06:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Why you all are blocking me continuously??

 * I won't review this unblock request, and I'm pretty sure nobody is going to change it into a fixed-term block from indefinite. I see below that you have had your talk page access revoked, so if this latest request is declined, what I'd suggest is that you stay away for at least the six-month period suggested at WP:Standard Offer and then make an appeal at WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)