User talk:Averruncus/Archive 3

Amy Pascal ANI closure
Just wanted to mention that I'm not seeing your explanation at. Might there be a formatting issue? Coretheapple (talk) 04:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Disregard, coding fixed. Coretheapple (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Bachner draft
Thank you for your recent suggestion. I've re-written the Renaming of baseball field paragraph as suggested. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Jordan_Bachner#Renaming_of_baseball_field TimHitchings (talk) 13:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you sir for approving my article. As you may have guessed I am emotionally invested in creating the article and was not sure if it would be considered notable enough to be published.  You and LouiseS1979 were extremely helpful and supportive. I'm now off to publish the good news on facebook to Bachner's parents.  Have a safe and Happy New Year.

TimHitchings (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * It was my pleasure to help. Arfæst! 18:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Goryeo
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Goryeo. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! Arfæst! 16:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
 Dear, HAPPY NEW YEAR !!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, --Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave on someone else's talk page.
 * Thanks, Nahnah4! Happy New Year to you too! Arfæst! 16:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

AFD closures
Hi Arfæst Ealdwrítere,

Not sure if you're aware but when closing AFDs the AFDs are generally supposed to look like this, Not like this - As it looks odd on the AFD log and most times now someone comes along to fixes it,

You could put  in to your vector.js area which means you'd be using the same tool as everyone else and not having to see me or someone else pop up to fix it :)

I have no issues with you using something else but I just thought I'd make you aware

I wish you a very Happy New Year :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 18:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. I have put it into the script my common.js subpage. Arfæst! 18:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That should have been User:Arfæst Ealdwrítere/vector.js Bazj (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops sorry I forgot to add "User:" - Thank god on the ball, Cheers, – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 18:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I've reverted your closure of this AfD. It has stirred up a considerable amount of debate, and the verdict is too controversial/tight a call in reality for a non-admin to close it; also, it needs a proper rationale for the closure anyway. And I say this as someone who voted to keep the article. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 01:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * It was my pleasure to help. Arfæst! 20:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 06:14:37, 3 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Michael W. Parker
I have been advised that my article for Herbert Bertram Strong has been rejected for "lack of notability". With all due respect to the reviewers who have made this decision, I find this outcome to be preposterous. This man is a co-founder of the PGA of America. In addition to that, many of the golf courses he designed have held major golf championships. And, as a player, he finished 9th in the 1913 U.S. Open.

Please re-consider this decision, which I believe is a mistake. I have spent hundreds of hours working on this article. I can't even begin to tell you how disappointing this decision is to me. Why would I ever want to donate another single penny to Wikipedia at this point?

I have no idea whatsoever what to change or add to the article to make it acceptable.

--Michael W. Parker (talk) 06:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Michael W. Parker (talk) 06:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have replied and explained my rationale at the article draft. Arfæst! 13:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Ealdwritere: I have incorporated all of the suggestions you put forth, all good ones I might add, and have re-submitted the Herbert Bertram Strong article. If there is anything else I can do to improve the article please feel free to let me know! Thank you. --Michael W. Parker (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Newport Beach, California
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Newport Beach, California. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your AFD closure...
Sorry, but in what world is this an appropriate discussion for closure by a non-admin? There are 3 deletion opinions, 5 keep opinions and a keep/merge. Beyond non-SNOW !vote-count, even the keep opinions acknowledge there are no sources but suggest there must be some out there. It hadn't been re-listed even once. In the context, your close was an obvious super-vote, something inappropriate from an admin, let alone a non-admin. I ask that you quickly self-revert.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 08:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Based on my above comment about a separate NAC, I think it's best you refrain from doing these in the near future Arfæst, because you're doing them inappropriately. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 10:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with John Banks Elliott. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Notify Online 11:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

AfD
Hi. When you NAC an AfD as as a redirect, please remember to  include the appropriate 'R from...' template on  the redirect  page so  that  it  informs the reader and populates the related category. However, in the light  of your accuracy  issues you  should not  be doing  this kind of work  at  all, and we would prefer you  to  concentrate on  adding  new content  or deleting vandalism until  you  have more experience. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Trees of Dartmouth College
I moved the information from the Trees of Dartmouth College page to a new section within the main Dartmouth College article. It is fine for the Trees of Dartmouth College page to be deleted; I'm not sure if that will happen automatically on 1/5/15, or if some other action needs to be taken. Msact (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * @Msact, the old page has been deleted by an admin. Arfæst! 19:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (remark)  @ 20:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

18:43:07, 5 January 2015 review of submission by UUJ2015
Hi and thanks for your review of my article"Firefighter Fitness". Can you tell me is it more the layout and lack of visuals that make this piece unsuitable. I read that you think it is not a balanced neutral article however I think that there are more than 20 citations and links to external literature and governmental reports establishing the facts for this item. Can i be bold and ask for some specific guidance from you as I do struggle with the computing aspect of doing this type of thing.

Kind regards

UUJ2015

UUJ2015 (talk) 18:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

andy Bennett musician
Hello

I am convinced that I have provided sufficient evidence to satisfy the notability guidelines for musicians regarding the page Andy Bennett Musician but feel that I am not getting any constructive feedback from Boleyn could you please take a look at his article for deletion read my argument and leave a comment detailing any further improvements you feel I need to make or if you are satisfied that the page could remain. Kind regards Alfie Mahone Alfiemahone1991 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Removal of your Teahouse host image
Hi Arfæst. Please see the edit summary here, upon my removal of your Teahouse host image. (There are millions of images at the commons you might use instead, which are at least claimed to be either in the public domain or bearing a compatibly free copyright license.) The issue is actually one that is important to understand and for advising new users at the Teahouse (often about drafts, where they are violating copyright by displaying a fair use image). In short, a fair use image may never be used outside of the article mainspace. Use in the mainspace itself is thorny. Each use must be buttressed by a proper fair use rationale, specific to the use the image is being put, and one that meets our strict non-free content criteria. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White supremacy
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:White supremacy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)