User talk:Avicennia marina

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Avicennia marina! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 11:02, Sunday, March 1, 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based conservation has been accepted
 Evidence-based conservation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Onel5969 (talk) 21:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Avicennia_marina help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Congratulations!
I am so happy for you and that you got your article published in Wikipedia. Congratulations! Now you need to create an article about your professor, he seems pretty notable.
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 19:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks
Let us create the article on Prof Sutherland right away! I will start it and you can help me in editing it.

Done
Dear Barbarba, Can you please check this page which I just edited: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Sutherland_(scientist) Many thanks!

Conservation links
Please note that information about conservation should be included directly in the article, using links to reliable sources as references. The text and link you have added to articles, such as this one, are promotional (asking to visit another website) rather than the encyclopedic. These additions have been reverted. Mind matrix  23:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Dear matrix, the reference is to an encyclopaedia on conservation interventions. Please check the website (non commercial and educational) before you reach a conclusion about it being promotional.


 * I didn't state the website was promotional. I said the text you posted on each Wikipedia article, such as the link I provided above, has a promotional tone that is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Anytime an editor writes something like "see [this site] for more information, it is promotional text. Mind  matrix  23:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * hello @Avicenna_marina, I came here via Brant_goose and I agree that the Conservation information in AEWA is clearly relevant although it may not be complete in an encyclopaedic sense (cf various Brant sub-species exist, outside scope of AEWA) ... I think this could be resolved by -1- First modifying your numerous statements to something like "The Brant goose is one of the species included in the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds, which includes specific actions suggested for its conservation. " and then (later, slowly) -2- species-by-species, adding a list of the suggested actions. Do you agree that -1- would be acceptable, @Mindmatrix, with -2- later? If there is agreement, I will happily do the Brant_goose page ! -- jw (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)