User talk:Avictory/Bordeaux

=Evaluations=

2/28/18 Evaluation by user:Kristinnmason
spelling/grammar: Excellent! Language: Well done. Organization: Well organized headings! Coding: Good job! Validity: Good sources. Completeness: I want to say good, however you are missing a source. Relevance: All relevant. Sources: Again, you are missing a source. Citations: Appropriately placed. References: I can only say again, 9/10 sources doesn't meet the hard requirement.

I really liked reading about this topic/city, I almost chose it myself! However, since there are only 9 sources I just feel like that will bring it down a letter grade. I had a really hard time finding sources myself and I know you can find one more!

2/28/18 Evaluation by user:guyarv
spelling/grammar: I would change "second to only Paris" to "second only to Paris". There are two spaces between "all" and "museums" under the culture header. Otherwise looks top notch.

Language: Nice and professional. No complaints.

Organization: Very well laid-out. I think it covers the basics very well.

Coding: No errors that I see.

Completeness: Seconding a missing source, but all else is good.

Relevance: Everything is relevant.

Sources: Missing one source, but they otherwise look good.

Citations: Proper.

Wonderful city and wonderful article on it. Thoughtful and complete.