User talk:Avierkant

I appreciate the editorial concern, but the datamoshing page refers to an established term within the realm of video art. I realize the page is currently bereft of much content, but it will grow. I believe it to be unfair to editorialize this technique's existence off of wikipedia.

You're having far too much fun!

(I like the mirror effect, but because many people use individual settings, the font and width aren't consistent, at my end)

I'll leave a welcome template below the warning templates. If you're going to continue to experiment in artistic ways, please revert your own edits afterwards, so as not to confuse the casual visitors. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kenneth Goldsmith has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Double Blue (Talk) 03:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kennethgoldsmith.jpg
Hi Avierkant!

We thank you for uploading Image:Kennethgoldsmith.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 03:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jean Baudrillard. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jean Baudrillard was changed by Avierkant (u) (t) deleting 34170 characters on 2008-10-09T03:36:28+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are a few pages that you might find interesting and helpful:
 * Editing: The concise cheatsheet, or the short introduction guide
 * Overview: The Five pillars, condensed philosophy and policies
 * Featured articles, the standard that all articles are trying to achieve (theoretically, eventually)
 * Our Manual of Style
 * Help:Contents, the main help menu

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages (the discussion tab) using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Don't be afraid of making mistakes, as all changes are kept, and problems can be easily reverted with the "history" tab of each page.

If you need help, check out Questions, or ask me on. Again, welcome! -- Quiddity (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  freshacconci  talk talk  23:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Datamoshing
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Datamoshing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable, cannot find any reliable source that uses the term. Please see WP:NEO. It will probably gain notoriety soon enough, just not now.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cerejota (talk) 04:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Salvatore robocop.png
Thanks for uploading File:Salvatore robocop.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
I appreciate the editorial concern, but the datamoshing page refers to an established term within the realm of video art. I realize the page is currently bereft of much content, but it will grow. I believe it to be unfair to editorialize this technique's existence off of wikipedia.


 * We have rather strict rules on sourcing, and content without sourcing can and will be challenged. Sometimes tagging is found to be sufficient because a realistic expectation of improvement is there. I simply see this as WP:NEO, when the term becomes notable, then it should have a page. Of course, perhaps the community feels it might be ready, but I remain unconvinced.


 * BTW: Template:Talkback has some things about the TB process, which you didn't quite get, although I am all in favor of using it. For example, it is customary to start threads in the target user page, and only use TB to indicate you responded to the user somewhere else... TB is never used to initiate conversations.--Cerejota (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * WP:NEO to wit:

Articles on neologisms frequently attempt to track the emergence and use of the term as observed in communities of interest or on the internet—without attributing these claims to reliable secondary sources. If the article is not verifiable [...] then it constitutes analysis, synthesis and original research and consequently cannot be accepted by Wikipedia. This is true even though there may be many examples of the term in use.


 * You understand this point?--Cerejota (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Korn, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 06:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Noshtimstrebor2.jpg


The file File:Noshtimstrebor2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused Wikipedia screenshot. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)