User talk:Avieshek

Thank you
Thanks for adding the references for the ultra-wide TV to 4K resolution, as I now see where the information comes from.--Father Goose (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

If the LG press release gives the resolution as 5120x2160, why did you change it back to 5136 in the table? Also, 5120x2160 is 21.333:9 and 5132x2160 is 21.4:9, which is why I changed it to ~21:9 (meaning "approximately" 21:9).--Father Goose (talk) 05:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I started to reply to your reply, but you removed it. Anyhow, here's my reply:


 * "A brand's production doesn't make things standardised" -- right, which is why I've been resisting adding new entries to the table until a standard emerges. At least with the ultra wide TVs you gave a reference for a specific model so that everyone knows where the facts are coming from.  This is important: verifiability is required on Wikipedia.  As you spend more time on Wikipedia, you'll find others insist on verifiability (and sources) as well.


 * For now, I don't know where you get the "5136x2160" number from. Please provide a source.  As for the ratio being 2.37, that means 2.37:1, which equates to 21.33:9 -- not 21 exactly, so a ~ should be used (~21:9).


 * Good luck with your continuing contributions to Wikipedia. I can see you want to help.  It takes a while to get used to how things are done on Wikipedia.  Don't take it personally when other Wikipedians interfere with what you're trying to do ("conservative", as you put it); sometimes we have good reasons.  (But not always.)--Father Goose (talk) 08:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

@Father Goose Respected Sir, with all due respect, I would like to offer my respect, gratitude and repeated thanks to u and seek guidance, prayers and friendship in future. I hope u r very fine and by now the existence of 5k resolutions is readily justified. I wonder how I get to know u more outside Wikipedia. U'r words r very calming and neutral and the context & intext of u'r message is very positive. I thank you again.

Speedy deletion of "Emotional agility"
A page you created, Emotional agility, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Josh3580 talk/hist 16:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 8K resolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High dynamic range. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)