User talk:Avocado202/Hot yoga

Peer review checklist
Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything that was added to the original article is most definately relevant to the article. The section about the benefits is a good addition to the article in general. I think that you could add a section that is about the side-effects of hot yoga and if there are any negative effects.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The addition is not entirely neutral, with the use of "you" being very prominent and the article including only the benefits of the activity. If you added a section about potential risks and eliminated the use of second-person narrative, the article would not be biased and would remain neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The benefits of hot yoga are the only thing added, so I guess that the benefits are overrepresented.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations are not present at the end of each paragraph, so there are no citations. To fix this, click the cite button at the end of each paragraph and enter all your sources into the cite option. This would give all your claims reliability and automatically enter your citation into the page.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The source is not necessarily reliable unless it referenced reliable sources in the article itself. If that is the case, you should cite those sources instead of that article. The information can be justified if the source is accurate and shows little to no biased viewpoints.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Nope.
 * Nope.

Lucanlouwsma (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)