User talk:Avocado Media

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Avocado Media", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or have the appearance of shared use. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. (www.avocadomedia.co.uk) --Hammersoft (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Lawrence Jones


A tag has been placed on David Lawrence Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at David Lawrence Jones
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from David Lawrence Jones. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I have deleted the article, bothfor promotionalism and because there is no reasonable claim to importance. You are apparently the advertising agency for his books--you are also the publisher listed on the catalog record for them, and ,since you publish nothing else, the books are essentially self-published. This is not considered a reasonable claim to importance. Especially considering the books are in essentially no libraries despite having been published several years ago, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are attempting to promote them. Considering that your web page consists solely of attempts to follow the twitter feeds of well known publishers, and announcements of book signing events, this is part of a spamming campaign. such is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. I am therefore also blocking you as an entirely promotional editor.  DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)