User talk:Avosterna

November 2022
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, JoyCut, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I represent the management of the band, how can provide a reliable source more than pasting the bio from the official website of the band?
 * You can check it out_ Avosterna (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in JoyCut. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to JoyCut has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 15:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * This is out of any reasons, when you say "it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder" ... what do you mean?
 * I am the holder.
 * I am using words of my own, directly from the official website I manage and edit continuously.
 * This is absurd! Avosterna (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If text from another source is added into Wikipedia, it needs to be compatible with Wikipedia's creative commons license. Steps to releasing text are available at WP:DONATETEXT. Regardless of whether or not the text is under an acceptable license, if it is promotional it will be removed. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * At the end of the day I am not allowed to improve and upgrade information ...
 * The info are old and not all of them are real ...
 * Text from another source is not been used here, and anytime I am trying to add something related to the current state of the band you delete that ... 101.56.102.231 (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * At the end of the day I am not allowed to improve and upgrade information ...
 * The info are old and not all of them are real ...
 * Text from another source is not been used here, and anytime I am trying to add something related to the current state of the band you delete that ...
 * Avosterna (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Avosterna (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I think you made an edit mistake, I provided to load all the reference in order to show how the information are clear and correct.
 * I need to improve this page, update it and solve some mistakes or fake news.
 * Please re-edit my last version, with all the news and upgraded information.
 * Thank you. Avosterna (talk) 13:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)