User talk:Avraham/Archive 35

Rashid Khalidi
Hi Avi. Thanks very much for soliciting my input. I hope my response will be understood as stern and not disrespectful, in light of your efforts. You're dealing with the NPOV problem quite well at the level of tone, and I respect that, but I confess to being mildly frustrated that the sourcing and notability issues I've raised multiple times on the talk page aren't being dealt addressed.--G-Dett (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Scroll up, to the part of the article before Khalidi's name appears, and you will see the Israeli government objecting to the entire advosory group on the grounds that they all speak for the PLO.  I don't mind your taking it out, but pleas do not make it sound as though I  invented it.Historicist (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist

Just read the article, I've got it open in a window now. I clicked right thorugh form the footnote I put onthe page. It 's pretty simple, lists Rashid as one of the three surviving sons. What were you looking for.?Historicist (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist


 * It reads : "He was a citizen of Saudi Arabia"  You know, in 1948, there were almost no educated Saudis.  Khalidi pere was left, more of less, with a PhD but without a country.  The Saudis needed a few educated men.  Ismail became Saudi.  Hussein became Jordanian.Historicist (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist


 * The Saudi citizenship is in the obit. Not the othere articles.  This is probably deliberate.  Rashid long preferred to give the impression that he was born and reared in Palestine.Historicist (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist


 * Ought I to reinstate the agreed upon text that Wikidemon removed again? Wikipedia politics/etiquette is baffling to me.Historicist (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist

please
review Chaim Walkin and rate it on the discussion page, if you think it's the right thing to do.--Korach (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

149.254.192.192/27 again I'm afraid
GraemeLeggett (talk · contribs) (No relation) is caught up in this range block. I know the block is causing difficulties and you're convinced that it's for the good of the project. You might want to arrange an exemption for him if he's not one of the suspected sock puppets. I don't know much about the case in question, so it's probably best for you to look at it. --GraemeL (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for dealing with that quickly. --GraemeL (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

In Case you are wondering
At my leisure, I'm going through all the well known Palestinians articles looking for unsourced smears and WP:UNDUE, so you don't have to email me at my talk to find out what i'm up to... We need a "critics of Israel" category to make it easier to go through all those articles and clean them up, as I've done haphazardly with ones I've run into in my internet/email travels. Unless there is one. Should I ask on Collaboration if can't find? Carol Moore 15:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Please see --Peter cohen (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Avi. I was invited to comment on this matter. I have left my comments here. Best wishes, Majoreditor (talk) 07:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 19:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocks - unblock-en-l
Hi there Avraham,

A couple of requests have come up regarding the very similar range blocks, so can you confirm these shouldn't be created or create the accounts? Here are the links: and. If you need to, feel free to email me.

Thanks,

The Helpful  One  14:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Responded via email to unblock list. -- Avi (talk) 23:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: CU request on Peterwill/Codywarren08
Thanks for completing the CU, Avraham. I was only concerned with the fact that it mystified me how 2 (seemingly unrelated) editors, neither who have admin powers, could recreate the page in exactly the same way with the same wording without them being the same person.

As you say the technical evidence indicates that its unlikely, does that include an IP check, or other way of testing, or is that pretty much it for the case? I'm not attempting to query your judgement, simply trying to understand the process itself. Thanks for your help and support. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Responded. -- Avi (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Date Linking RFC
Hi Avraham, I noticed that on Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date Linking RFC you opposed the deprecation of linking dates for autoformatting purposes without a reason. I just want to know why you oppose that. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Emanuel - Orthodox
According to sources in the article, he is a member of an Orthodox synagogue. Is that not enough for the cat?-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 00:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Who knows who keeps Shabbas and keeps Taharas Mishpacha. How are you ever going to get a reliable source for that? I would think that it should only be based on something that is far more transparent, i.e. membership in an Orthodox synagogue. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 00:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Is there a source that he sends his kids to a reform school? I did see somewhere that his rabbi allowed him to work on Rosh Hashana because Congress was in some sort of budget emergency session. Notwithstanding these facts, I think you are going down a dangerous road. Firstly, how to define Orthodox is something that is not clear cut. Does a women have to cover her hair to be considered Orthodox? If a women wears pants is she Orthodox? Can someone be Orthodox if they send their 5 year-old kid to a conservative school because its the only jewish school in his 100 mile radius? From what I understand, these questions are something that different reasonable Orthodox Jews will disagree on. Your approach will therefore turn close bio calls into Rabbinic arguments. Secondly, these factors, i.e. shabbas, kosher, taharas mishpacha, are rarely covered by reliable sources. We would have to use original research, rumor, and innuendo in deciphering a person's level of observance. These issues are greatly exacerbated by the fact that we, as in this case, we are dealing with a blp. That's why I would suggest that we follow what the person considered himself to be. Something like that is usually sourced and would not run into any blp problems. If someone is a member of an orthodox synagogue he basically professes himself to be Orthodox and should  be considered Orthodox. -- brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 00:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The "Newest" source says that he sends his children to the same Conservative day school that he attended. I think that is sufficient to demonstrate that he is Conservative and certainly not Orthodox. -- Avi (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * It might or it might not. See my argument above. But the editor listed after you in the phone book just made a decent point on the Emanuel talk page - better safe then sorry. So although I agree with the removal of the cat in this specific case, I think your overall approach is problematic.


 * On a separate note, can I ask you for a favor? The archives of my talk page are all screwed up. While one archive link works the other links to god-knows-what. Can you look into it? -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Jagiyer
Your checkuser block. Thought I would let you respond to the unblock request. Later. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 02:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Archives
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. My silly real-life caught up with me. Thanks so much for helping with me with my archives. Its much better now. Yes you can delete that one messed up page. Two questions: I now have two archive boxes. One on the top and one on the side. Can the top one be "merged" with the side one? Also, shouldn't the November 2008 archive show up already on the archives? Thanks, -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 22:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
You are edit warring a BLP vio with this edit. Please show good faith, self-revert, and rejoin the consensus discussions, which you are no doubt aware of. If you do not I will. 02:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Gemma Haines
Would you mind reviewing the situation at Talk:Gemma Haines? User:Daniel claims that we have received a OTRS request (though he hasn't cited a ticket number) complaining of "distress" caused by the presence of notability and primarysources tags on the article and that that justifies their removal. Jfire (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I love the immediate assumption that I'm lying about the existence of a ticket...thanks Avi for putting him in his place - he clearly needs it. Daniel (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Demon trouble
I hope that you have the patience ot read the posting re: our Demon. After being called on stalling tactics, he agreed to a concensus, after being called on posting material not in the concensus, he backed off again. I truly percieve a pattern of endless stalling as a straategy. I am not certain what set of wikipedia rules it violates. Perhaps he should be arned or reprimanded. I do think this information is worth working to get on the page. I'll be back to support you tomorrow. Historicist (talk) 03:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist