User talk:AwardShowFan123/Archive3

Thanks
Thanks for your support and input at Kristen Blake's talk page. I really appreciate it! Hope you're doing well, and amazing job with all pages containing to Daytime Emmys. You've grown so much as an editor, and it is such a great thing to see!  livelikemusic  my talk page! 16:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * , No problem, it was my pleasure!!! You did not deserve what that editor said. Furthermore, thank you. You are really sweet, youŕ compliments means a lot especially from a fantastic editor like you. I think we can considered you a veteran of editing Wikipedia! YES! You are that good. Anyways, How are you? What are you think of soaps right now? I have not watched B&B since April because it was getting so boring. Is it getting better, should I try watching it again? Its funny, because B&B was the first soap I have ever watched. DAYS is getting better because Eileen Davidson is back, BTW, she won the Emmy for Best Actress!!! YAY, I was rooting for her. The Eve and Jennifer lawsuit is so boring and stupid. Like, who cares about that lawsuit? Theresa and Brady storyline is also boring but at least the acting is good especially from Jen Lilley. GH is awesome as always, I kinda like the Lucy/Scott/Bobbie love triangle, I just think they can make more interesting. I am kinda sad that they burned down Alexis' house because it was one of the few house that the characters lives in like half the town lives in a penthouse or at the MetroCourt. The Mob boss storyline is not bad but could be better, The Britt/Nikolas/Elizabeth love triangle is bad, like Rebecca Herbst is an amazing actress and they could of give a better storyline. Like, a cancer or disease one. She would of rocked a storyline like that. The ELQ fiasco, I do not care, at all. The thing that is good about GH is that the storylines might not be as good but at least they are storylines unlike Y&R the only person you watched all day is Steve Burton, like I dont care. Its funny how JFP is forcing him on us like we could not see throughtit (Owner of Crimson Light, Paul and Nikki's son etc...) But I must say the Devon/Hilary/Neil triangle isnt totally bad, just could be better. The others storylines are pretty bad like dont get me started on the Stich past thing. But I am excited for Gina Tognoni to return as Phyllis. But I am sad that Sharon's life is gonna be destroy even that she brought upon herself.....Well again, thank you for compliments and sorry for the long message. Best Regards,  — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 18:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Academy Award for Best Actress
Hi there,

It's been a long time, but I was wondering if you could reformat the winners and nominees table for Academy Award for Best Actress as you did for Best Actor. I will attempt to promote it to Featured List status this April. I appreciate your help for the Best Actor table.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi! Sorry the late response! I have been busy the past few weeks and I have drop only a few times on Wikipedia and I forgot to get back to you therefore I apologize! I would love and I am willing to re-format the winners and nominees table, I will see if I can do it this week but no promises! If I can't do this week, I will do it as soon as I can! Thanks! — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 21:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Ava Jerome page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=659763812 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F659763812%7CAva Jerome%5D%5D Ask for help])

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Daytime Emmys.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Daytime Emmys.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:42nd Daytime Emmys.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:42nd Daytime Emmys.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)