User talk:AwayEnter

Deletions
I'll grant you that "promotional" may not have been an optimal word choice, particularly for an organization with goals as noble as this.

However, what you submitted was... it was basically a press release. You nudged it a little way towards being an article —-- some wikifying, some external links to news articles —-- but in the end, it was still a press release. We probably should have an article about CAS... but we shouldn't have that as an article about CAS. Understand? DS (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sometimes, when people ask to have deeply-flawed articles restored to their userspace so that they can edit them... they just wander away and leave the deeply-flawed version sitting untouched in userspace. If you don't actually work on improving the article (here it is), I'll have to delete it again. Got it? DS (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... good work. Still needs some more, but it's almost ready for mainspace. DS (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Much better. It's back in mainspace; good job. DS (talk) 12:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Coalition Fight Music for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coalition Fight Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coalition Fight Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.30.196.253 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 7 November 2012

Articles for deletion/Coalition Fight Music
Not sure if you're still checking this page or not - but I saw on this article's talk page that you had worked on it at one point. Thought I'd let you know that it has been sent to AFD by an IP editor. Comments, as always, are welcome. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)