User talk:Awdko00

Welcome!
Hello, Awdko00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Easybook, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GSK (t • c) 03:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Easybook


A tag has been placed on Easybook, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSK (t • c) 03:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Review
Easybook was deleted under section G11, I need review for the content, it has been actively edited to be as neutral and encyclopedic possible.

Awdko00 (talk) 04:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * To submit your draft for review, click the submit button or type submit at the top of the page and click save. &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 04:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Easybook
Hello Awdko00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Easybook for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 04:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easybook (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Easybook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Awdko00 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Awdko00 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Please explain why it is false. Also, you've been writing a lot of adverts here, not any different from the other accounts. Please provide some valid reasoning. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Anthony Bradbury is the admin who declined your previous unblock request - that's just his signature. This account is blocked as a sock of User:Baligema. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Noting the strange assumption of association, together with two different miss-spellings of my name, I had assumed, given that the account is a sockpuppet, that this was a deliberate attempt to appear wikipedically naiive. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're probably right. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * When I am upset I don't check my grammar, it is my 3rd or 4th language. Awdko00 (talk) 02:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)