User talk:AwesomeHurricaneBoss

Hi, I'm AwesomeHurricaneBoss, and this is my talk page. You can talk to me here, and leave me messages. Please do not violate when talking to me on this page. I will do my best to view your messages and respond to you ASAP! Please note that I am a semi retired user and will no longer be very active in editing.

Welcome!
Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 21:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Dam222. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. -Shift674-🌀contribs 15:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your signature
Use the four tildes when you leave a message ~ Dam222 🌋 (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
how many times we have to remind you not to use F13 data? Fleur De  Odile  18:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tropical cyclones in 2021, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. This is a warning of your recent contribution which was reverted by HurricaneEdgar Bera  niladri19  🌀🌀 16:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome !
HurricaneEdgar   23:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Josie (March 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarioJump83 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyclone Josie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cyclone Josie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cyclone_Josie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarioJump83&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cyclone_Josie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Mario Jump  83!  12:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2020-21 Australian region cyclone season. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''We’ve warned you before about using original research. Again, please make sure that you use a reliable source when adding info onto articles, like the JTWC. -Shift674-🌀''contribs 13:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Um, I thought that JTWC was F13 data? Someone on Wikipedia told me that, not sure who though... AwesomeHurricaneBoss (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * F13 is an abbreviation for Force 13. There’s an article about this topic, the editor had assumed you put estimates from the organization into articles. -Shift674-🌀contribs 15:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * This section may help you in the future. -Shift674-🌀contribs 15:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks for the help! AwesomeHurricaneBoss (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Typhoon Goni. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

'' When reverted, discuss the changes on the talk page. This specific procedure has a name: BRD—bold, revert, discuss. Please use Talk:Typhoon Goni to discuss changes to the image and avoid making further reverts until the discussion has been finished.'' Chlod (say hi!) 23:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We use in MFR not in zoom earth   HurricaneEdgar    13:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa (March 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Meteorological_history_of_Cyclone_Yasa Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Meteorological_history_of_Cyclone_Yasa reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC submission
Hi AwesomeHurricaneBoss. Please don't submit AfC drafts if it is nowhere near complete yet. I had to log in to tell you about this.  Mario Jump  83!  23:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Uh, which submission are you referring to? The one where I submitted Typhoon Vernon in 1993? Sorry but I'm a bit confused. AwesomeHurricaneBoss (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

A message from AwesomeHurricaneBoss
Hello everyone, it's me, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. I am just writing to say that I am currently working on a draft for Cyclone Habana. If anyone is interested in helping me to edit, you are most welcome. The draft link will be seen on anytime the word draft appears in this message. Thanks! AwesomeHurricaneBoss (talk) 15:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Unless Habana broke any records, such as being the longest-lived storm in the SWIO, I don't see a need for this article, as it didn't cause any deaths or significant effects/damage. CodingCyclone!  🌀 📘 19:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It was pretty strong, one, and two it was super long lived. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 21:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but again, it comes down to if we need an article for this storm. It doesn't appear to nearly be notable enough, and as such there isn't much of a need at all for an article. Also, your draft is very incomplete. that is what was trying to tell you. However, you are welcomed to keep editing articles, so don't let this deter you. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox  18:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2020 Pacific hurricane season. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Cristina was not a hurricane, at least not according to the NHC! CycloneYoris talk! 21:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that... 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 11:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Typhoon Surigae, you may be blocked from editing.  Surigae is still active as an extratropical cyclone, please provide a source to say it has dissipated ~~ 🌀𝚂𝙲𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙰🌀 17:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


 * JTWC and JMA says it is dissipated 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 20:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * What they mean there is that it has undergone extratropical transition and is no longer a tropical cyclone. However, if you look at OPC surface analyses and advisories, you will see that it's remnant low is still active, and fairly strong too. ~ 🌀 Hurricane Covid 🌀 22:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Sennecaster. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on João Baião, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' Additionally, you must provide attribution to any translations from any other wiki. This is a copright violation, and a double violation of both the BLP and Copyright policies.''  Sennecaster   ( What now? ) 00:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Tropical Storm Edouard (2020) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Sennecaster  ( What now? ) 00:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Changing tropical cyclone images
Hey, I just recently reverted some of your edits, and I want to give you some advice since you're still a somewhat new editor. IR images are preferred sometimes if any other visible image is somewhat far from peak. I'd recommend you read the WPTC image guidelines for further information. Lastly, I'd advise that if you want to change an image, please take it to the talk page first and wait for consensus since sudden image changes in highly viewed articles can have an impact.  Akber mamps  02:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, ty for the info. =-) 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 13:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa
Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Hurricane Grace. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --219.78.190.57 (talk) 16:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Page moves
I have reverted your page move of Tropical Storm Nicholas (2021) to the draftspace because it was disruptive. Landfalling storms should not be draftified as that effectively takes them out of the limelight where they will receive attention from the public, which results in article expansion. WPTC's practice is to have storms threatening land in the mainspace rather than as drafts so they can be expanded and provide information to readers. As long as an article can pass as a stub, it shouldn't be moved to the draftspace. Please consider the ramifications of page moves before doing them as some of your other recent page moves have also been disruptive. Noah Talk 00:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This is your final warning. Please stop with the page moves done without consensus. I saw that you reverted your moved, but please  do not move a page without consensus again. Continuing this behavior will result in a block. Thank you. Destroyer (Alternate account) 17:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Also, please talk it out with here.Destroyer (Alternate account) 22:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I performed 2 reverts in the past 24 hrs. We did a discussion on the talk and agreed on the image I keep reverting to. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 10:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Just please keep in mind WP:BRD in the future. Best, Destroyer (Alternate account) 19:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names (September 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_tropical_cyclones_with_auxiliary_names Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krishnavilasom_Bhageerathan_Pilla&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_tropical_cyclones_with_auxiliary_names reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan  (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  20:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Subtropical Storm Ana (2021)
Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subtropical Storm Ana (2021), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me. There is a new draft that I will edit soon on the same topic. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 12:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive page moves
Please stop with the disruptive page moves. I noticed that you carried out at least a couple of disruptive or counterproducive page moves since you were last warned about this issue in September. You need to stop making controversial page moves without a discussion (by "controversial, I mean non-Common Sense moves, or any moves that could require a discussion). For your most recent move, Hurricane Nana (2020) does not need or warrant the long and clunky title that you moved it to. Cyclonebiskit explicitly stated on Nana's talk page that this was unnecessary. Regardless of the exact title used, Julio would've had to have been mentioned in some detail in the MH, so the move wasn't really justified. Not to mention that the longer title violates WP:PRECISE. Consider this your last warning. Please do not make another controversial page move.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there.
 * I thought that we should move the page because of the current track. I apologize if my edit was useless. Feel free to revert it, unless it has already been so. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 10:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to add that controversial page moves are A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies: a)there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; b)someone could reasonably disagree with the move. per Requested moves/Controversial. Please bear this in mind in the future. Thanks. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 22:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I also was wondering if we should merge Grace's article with a section for Marty. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 21:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa


Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meteorological history of Cyclone Yasa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I am fully aware of the decision for it to be deleted, and I will not be requesting undeletion. 🌀 AwesomeHurricaneBoss 🌀 16:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names
Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names


Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names


Hello, AwesomeHurricaneBoss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of tropical cyclones with auxiliary names".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors
Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 03:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)