User talk:Awesome 210

Welcome!
Hello, Awesome 210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Procolophonida, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Procolophonida


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Procolophonida. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Procolophonidae. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Procolophonidae – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:Taxonomy/Kuehneotheria
Hello Awesome 210, I noticed that your edit to Kuehneotheria seems like original research and is not allowed on wikipedia. It was named as a super legion by Mckenna in 1975, not an order. Could you change it back as I have already had to revert an edit by Awesome 209 who did the exact same change. Reid,iain james (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Reid,iain james (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Millerosauroidea
Thanks for contributing the new article Millerosauroidea. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding sources to the article you created and by making it clear how the sources support the material. See here for how to do inline referencing. Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 15:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Eparctyona
Hi, I'm Barney the barney barney. Awesome 210, thanks for creating Eparctyona!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please reference

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Changes to Sauropsida template
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Template:Taxonomy/Sauropsida. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MMartyniuk (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sundatheria


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sundatheria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. রাহাত | ✉   18:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cotylosauria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Onychophorida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Class (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Preptotheria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Take it easy with template editing
Hello! caused the Speciesbox template in the Human article to show broken wikicode. When editing templates, please make sure that your edit does not cause problems for existing transclusions, especially with regards to highly transcluded templates such as the Taxonomy template. Regards, Hey  mid  (contribs) 21:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Awesome 210—if someone reverts your edit with a summary containing text like "apparently breaking the species box template" — don't reinstate your edit without understanding what is going on. In fact, if anyone reverts any edit of yours for any reason, don't revert it without discussing.  Doing so can be edit warring, is highly disruptive, and can lead to having your account blocked. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 16:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Longirostres for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Longirostres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Longirostres until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HCA (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Crocodilia
I'm not sure why you added a fictional taxonomic revision by, ostensibly, a 10-year-old, but if you do it again, I will request a permanent ban. This is your only warning. HCA (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Marking controversial edits as minor
Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Crocodilia, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Longirostres


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Longirostres, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Temporarily blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
 * I have blocked you for 48 hours due to your edit history. So far your edits have been seen as disruptive and you've been given several warnings to stop, which you haven't heeded. You simply cannot make up something and then add it to Wikipedia. This is seen as a neologism at best and at worst, just a hoax and outright vandalism. If you continue with these types of edits when the block is up, the block will become permanent. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tree of life (phylogenetics)


A tag has been placed on Tree of life (phylogenetics), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Caffeyw (talk) 07:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Tree of life (phylogenetics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tree of life (phylogenetics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tree of life (phylogenetics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Caffeyw (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Nycteroleteria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nycteroleteria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nycteroleteria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HCA (talk) 13:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Procolophonia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HCA (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * How was that vandalism? ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 16:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The user is deliberately replacing established scientific taxonomy with a taxonomy they made up, have never published, and is not in use in the scientific community. The user has done this before (and been temporarily banned for it), and multiple pages they have created have been deleted or are in the process. HCA (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah; I see. Vandalism isn't the right word but this is nevertheless quite disruptive and needs to stop.  Awesome 210: I'm not sure what else needs to be said to make that clear.  If you wish to continue editing here, you will need to discuss these kinds of revisions ahead of time and build consensus.  Please let me know if you need any assistance with this; for example how to find the best place for such discussions.  Thank you, and thank you HCA for cleaning up this mess. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 16:43, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pareiasauromorpha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pareiasauromorpha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pareiasauromorpha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HCA (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm back after, what, 2 years?
Hi. I'm finally back. It took me so long to get here because I forgot my password. Anyway,, I was an idiot. I promise to not make any more un-cited (if that's a word) edits. I am deeply sorry for that. -Awesome 210
 * Welcome back. Just as a reminder, for article content, the key policies are verifiability, Neutrality, and No Original Research. As for user conduct, remember to be bold but not reckless, and discuss potentially controversial changes or additions beforehand, or if your edits are reverted. The bold-revert-discuss cycle can be constructive. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I was a stupid idiot back in 2013.

-Awesome 210

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Caution
Your recent edit summary to the Animal article here was incivil and has been struck. Please read WP:Civility and avoid such in the future. Vsmith (talk) 22:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply: OK then. -Awesome 210

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lifeform-stub
Template:Lifeform-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)