User talk:Awesomeday 2015

December 2014
Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to ALCO Stores because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Muboshgu (talk) 20:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at US Airways. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Donaldson. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 02:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Adam LaRoche. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Matt Kemp. ... disco spinster   talk  03:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Kemp
The Kemp deal isn't done. It might fall through. The Rollins deal is contingent on the Kemp deal. We need to wait and see if they happen or not. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Advice
In their warnings above, editors above have expressed a concern over your editing. You should consider using an edit summary or discussing on the article talk page to reach a consensus when your edit may be contrary to a hidden instruction in the article. Also, WP:SPORTSTRANS discusses some of the concerns with editing based on breaking news about player transactions; a key policy on Wikipedia is that all edits must be verifiable.—Bagumba (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)