User talk:Awesomedjh

Hello there me! How are you doing?

DJ H

December 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Timeline of electronic music genres has been reverted. Your edit here to Timeline of electronic music genres was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEI4qSrkPAs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CoryxKenshin


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on CoryxKenshin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your edits to Rick Riordan
Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your recent edits to Rick Riordan, because you removed (accidentally, I presume) a reference and did not add to the passage's quality. On a similar note, your use of the phrase "coming soon" would also have been cause for removal, as it does add to a suitably encyclopedic tone. Lastly, while Riordan has certainly written Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard, it is not nearly so notable as his other works (Actually, I may need to revisit that "notables" list, because it ought to be shorter.).

Anyway, I hope there are no hard feelings. I'm taking the time to leave this message because I appreciate what you were trying to do and I want to explain why I did what I did. Have you considered joining the Rick Riordan Task Force? Its members would be more than happy to help you edit more constructively, and most are just as passionate about Riordan and his works as you seem to be. Happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Edelstone


A tag has been placed on Henry Edelstone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 02:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:2ReinreB2. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:2ReinreB2— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version), you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Genealogies of Genesis. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You are repeatedly inserting a wikilink that gives an errant impression into multiple Wikipedia articles. Shearonink (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neon Genesis Evangelion. You are creating wikilinks (to an article that is up for deletion), these links give the wrong impression about content. Shearonink (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Translation of Genesis (Jewish Version). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Book of Genesis. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Book of Genesis – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Theroadislong (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Haim. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A formality, given the history above. Will ask for a block. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B522:57FE:97E5:AE4 (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * For this, which is what you were doing prior to being blocked. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B522:57FE:97E5:AE4 (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Timeline of electronic music genres, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello!!!
Your awesome!!!!!

Coolcra-zbabblers (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 

You're awesome!!!!
You're the best!!!!!!!

Coolcra-zbabblers (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 