User talk:Awg1010

Supreme Court of the United States
I take it you had an edit conflict? I'm done with it right now, in case you want to go ahead and tinker with it. Cheers! Magidin (talk) 21:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

County redirects
Yes, I think more redirects never hurt. I am busy today, but can help this week if you want. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Geographical coordinates reference
Can you help me? I'm planing on tagging about a dozen or so articles with geographical coordinates of buildings, and I was wondering, do I need to list a proper source for the data. Because I have the information but I don't know an easy way of referencing it. If it matters I'm using the "coord" template. Thanks --Awg1010 (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know what folks do in most cases. I would suggest asking at Template talk:coord or the geocoding wikiproject.  I usually don't cite mine, since they are derived from simply using one of the map applications to position the marker.  -J JMesserly (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you learn just how to do the geographical coordinates of buildings, here and on Wikimedia Commons, please let me know how you obtain the coordinates, and how you post them. Dthomsen8 (talk) 12:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Dthomsen8

LEA infobox
Thanks for all the great work, but please copy the entire infobox, blank parameters included, so other editors can add information without having to return to the template page. Thanks! ninety:one 22:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ta. You're going to have a hard time with the UK though! The infobox is written for countries where they only have "law enforcement agencies", but for some reason we've decided to stick with calling the British ones "police forces", so autocategorisation is very hard. I'm going to turn off autocat on MOD Police because is no longer has a clue. Also, if you feel like doing any territorial police forces, please copy the bespoke skeleton I wrote here - as there are some very specific requirements for UK forces. ninety:one 00:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I've tried it twice now, and it's not happening! Not too much of a deal though (also - to link to a template without using it in the page, you can write Infobox Police Department which gives you Infobox Police Department ). Cheers. ninety:one 00:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Concern
Can you please find a picture and post it on this section of WTC 5 that shows the original World Trade Center Tower 5 in clear quality before 9/11, so I can see what it looked like before damaged on 9/11. Thank you. Bob.--99.141.168.216 (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

you concern about my personal info
no need to be concerned about my personal info. The phone number you found is not mine. - Davodd (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Fantasy Black Channel FAC
Hi, sorry to bother you but the FAC people are being really anal and want supporting users to additionally state whether they believe the sources to be reliable because Ealdgyth left them to the editors' discretion (no idea why especially as I fulfilled his criteria). Could you pop back and add your thoughts about them to your support? Thanks. Rafablu88 (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

MONTHNUMBER
I forgot to say thnaks for that. Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 16:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC).

OpenID
I've taken a stab at adding categorization to your userbox. I think I did it correctly. By the way, the light yellow looks great. ...but what do you think? ~B F izz 23:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject United States Government
Greetings. I noticed that you are one of the few members of WikiProject United States Government that are still active so I wanted to ask you a question. It appears that this project is mostly inactive aside from what the members might be doing independently. I was considering suggesting that this project be pulled in under WikiProject United States and wanted to solicit comments from some of this projects members before doing so. As with Washington DC and the others the project would for the most part maintain its own independence but I believe this would benefit both projects. What do you think about this? --Kumioko (talk) 00:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry I didn't reply sooner but I just noticed your comments on my talk page that seemed to post at the same time as another comment so I didn't catch it. To answer you question about which project woudl take over. Basically both projects would remain and WPUSGovernment would still maintain control of its inner workings. This isn't an effort to eliminate the project but to make sure that the articles are being worked on and watched even when the project isn't active. I have done this for a couple other US related projects already (US counties, Superfunds, etc.) but what I would do though is:
 * add WikiProject United States Governement to the list of projects supported by WPUS so that it would receive the same benefits (including the bots, newsletter, portal, collaboration space, etc.) as the more active project with more members.
 * I would add a link to WikiProject United States Government at the top of the project page for WikiProject United States (more eyes means in theory more activity).
 * I would add WikiProject US Government to WikiProject United States as well as a subcategory under Category:United States articles by topic.
 * I would then retag all affected articles with the WPUS/USGov banner and remove the USGov banner from the article talk pages
 * I would then request that the US government banner be deleted (no offense intended to the project but leaving the banner means that someone might add it to articles rrequiring cleanup later). If preferred I can just redirect it to the WPUS banner.
 * I would then do a run to tag articles relating to US government and which are in the projects scope and are not currently tagged as such. Depending on the projects scope there are far more articles that could or should be associated that are not currently. This would be discussed and clarified before moving forward to ensure consensus and agreement on what the scope of the project is/should be.
 * I hope this helps but please ket me know if you have any questions.--Kumioko (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Re:Who is this for?
Wow, that was uploaded more then 3 years ago. I haven't got the slightest clue for what though, why do you ask? Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-=  20:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Honestly I wouldn't bother, just delete it. I probably just made it. Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-=  12:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
.--Kumioko (talk) 01:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)