User talk:Awiseman/Archive/2009/September

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #8
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.

--User:Nbahn 04:37, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
- SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 21:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk pages
Article talk pages are there to discuss changing the article. They are not there to discuss the subject of the article as if the talk page were a forum or newsgroup. That is why I have removed your comment on Talk:Kamen Rider Series. Also, all of your questions are easily answered if you actually read the article. Your first point is answered in the first sentence and your other point is answered throughout the rest of the article.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 05:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * So I missed it, you don't have to be snippy about it. --AW (talk) 06:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's not the point. The talk page isn't there to ask stuff about the article's subject. It's about improving the article.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the explanation for the name would be useful for improving the article, which is why I asked. I missed that explanation, obviously. --AW (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You could have said "This article does not adequately describe the subject" and then I would have pointed out where the descriptions are instead of asking a question as if you were asking about the subject rather than the article.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 07:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I called it "Names?" Anyway, I think you should Assume good faith and take another look at the Civility. Nobody wants to get snapped at for asking a question. --AW (talk) 19:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Democratic primaries
I just wanted to say thanks for you assistance on Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 1964. For future reference, I think links to Google Book Search are discouraged. Don't ask me to quote a policy - it's just the general consensus I've been seeing. Not sure about JSTOR, which I linked to for the journal article. Please let me know if you find anything new out in one direction or the other. Thanks again. Recognizance (talk) 06:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That makes sense about Google Books. --AW (talk) 18:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)