User talk:Axedd/Archive 3

Assuming bad faith
I am not going to care what disruptive editors like you think whenever I revert anyone with my account. Don't assume bad faith against me or anyone or else I will report you for your disruption. --Yoonadue (talk) 00:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * You should read WP:STONEWALL. No one is assuming bad faith here, my only intention was to warn/advice against this improper conduct so as to make sure you'd be careful in your future interactions with other editors. Kiu99 (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * And reverting on a page you've never edited before just to edit war with others is never a good idea. Kiu99 (talk) 06:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Le Cheung edit?
Hi I think this is most likely the sock they again are using the similar edit history and spamming unreliable sources such as first Post as evidence another user has now come along to add Times Now which is clearly an even worse choice than Firstpost to restore the socks edit here:  how are Indian biased sources allowed on articles such as these? If that wasnt enough the child sexual abuse page is also doing the same thing in regards to singling out Pakistan and the user as expected is a sock now banned but there edit keeps getting restored. Xalimo (talk) 08:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * FYI: User:Xalimo is a verified sock. Adakiko (talk) 10:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I think it's time for you to stop logging into Wikipedia for awhile. Codenamewolf (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Sakastan is unrelated to the topic of the Pamir mountains
Their are better maps of the Pamir why remove that map I added or if you dont like the map why dont you add a better one what the hell does Sakastan have to do with the Pamir Mountains.

Can you please protect the Pamir mountains page please, Sakastan picture is irrelevant one user just wants to add that back again and again and are not ready to listen.

Lists
Hi Codenamewolf,

It's often best if a list is actually a list (in the HTML sense) rather than using a symbol or linebreak manually. So where at Muhajir (Pakistan) you wrote literal bullets and spaces, I converted it to an hlist. There is a whole family of related templates for different situations. Let me know if you need help with them. DMacks (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok thank you. Will do. Codenamewolf (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Question
Hi Codenamewolf, I'm not sure why you reverted this sourced content. Can you shed some light? Thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Are you the same user behind the IP who added this? I've already left a comment at their talk page why I think it's an unreliable rumour. Codenamewolf (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * First, no, as a quick look at my edit history will confirm--please WP:AGF. As for the content, it was supported by two published sources, which is why I was surprised by the contention that it was a rumor. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That claim is not supported by RS at all. It's a wife of a journalist making sensational claims about what her husband told her years ago regarding what he supposedely heard in person from a famous personality. People will say anything for attention. Codenamewolf (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for typing on my talk page,i,m new so i make mistakes,kindly guide me.Thank You so much RedHood9112 (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok Codenamewolf (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karachi Province


The article Karachi Province has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Saqib (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)