User talk:Axel Borg Duca

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Columbia Pictures has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Columbia Pictures was changed by Axel Borg Duca (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950564 on 2016-01-14T18:59:51+00:00.

June 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kirkop. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer was changed by Axel Borg Duca (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894041 on 2016-06-18T07:37:01+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kirkop. Jim1138 (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 01:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kirkop you‎ may be blocked from editing without further notice You have previously been blocked for vandalizing this article, the next block will be longer. - Arjayay (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Les Studios Tex
Hello Axel Borg Duca,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Les Studios Tex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. David. moreno 72   08:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Les Studios Tex


A tag has been placed on Les Studios Tex, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Les Studios Tex. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coca-cola unifies its brand worldwide.jpg
Hello Axel Borg Duca,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coca-cola unifies its brand worldwide.jpg for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

~  Pog ing  Juan  16:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Coca-cola unifies its brand worldwide.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Coca-cola unifies its brand worldwide.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pepsi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.&mdash;J. M. (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)