User talk:Axfield



Weasel Words
This edit isn't acceptable. If you can't figure out why than do what you should've done in the first place: read WP:WEASEL. Ditto with pretty much all of your other edits to the article (which I'm reverting since you have now been reverted by two users). Perhaps, given that you're partial towards the WWE, you should consider taking an edit break from the article; because terms such as "smear campaign" are clear violations of Wikipedia policies on neutrality.--74.166.60.24 (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear - I tried to find as many pages that I could so that you could contribute productively,
 * Your edit here is a vio of WP:REF (you didn't actually cite anything), RS (since you're faux-citation was referencing a primary source) and WP:OR (because the 9/16th claim and the claim about the clothing was not confirmed by a secondary source and therefore were presumably based on analysis by you).--74.166.60.24 (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Responding to your email
You are not blocked. On 23 May 2009 blocked you for 48 hours. That is your only block. Toddst1 (talk) 12:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The articles you have been editing are protected, which I guess could be the source of your confusion. PhilKnight (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.