User talk:Axline3

Welcome!
Hello, Axline3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Restore the Arts, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 18:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Restore the Arts


A tag has been placed on Draft:Restore the Arts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 18:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Restore the Arts (September 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deepfriedokra were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Restore the Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Restore the Arts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Restore_the_Arts Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deepfriedokra&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Restore_the_Arts reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--  Deep fried  okra    18:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
 Draft:Restore the Arts has been deleted

Hello, Axline3. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Draft:Restore the Arts has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Identifying blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD give the appearance of an editor violating Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so. Sometimes creators of promotional content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has has been trained to write or spent some time writing corporate documents or mission/vision statements or anything similar, they may simply be blind to the promotionality. It can be hard to unlearn.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. --  Deep fried  okra    18:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Axline3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Restore the Arts, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --  Deep fried  okra    18:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.-- VViking Talk Edits 18:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Or read the linked pages in the deletion notice.--  Deep fried  okra    18:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Also please view Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause and FAQ/Organizations. You might feel that a cause is worthy, especially if you are involved with it, but that does not necessarily mean that it merits an article in Wikipedia.


 * Wikipedia articles cover notable topics — those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia. Organizations must must Wikipedia's notability guidelines to be considered worthy of inclusion. These apply equally to for-profit businesses and non-profit organizations.


 * We consider evidence from reliable and independent sources to gauge this attention. Wikipedia has no interest in what an organization wants to say about itself or how it wants to be portrayed. Primary sources like an organization's website are of limited value. Blogs, social media and other self-published sources are disqualified outright, as well as someone's unpublished personal knowledge or experiences. We only care about what third-party writers, who have no vested interest in the topic, have chosen to publish about it.


 * We highly discourage people who are involved with a topic to create an article about it, due to the inherent conflict of interest. If you are involved with the subject of your writing, you will find it difficult to write from the required neutral point of view and use information taken only from unaffiliated sources. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2019 (UTC)