User talk:AxonTerminal

August 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of hacker groups, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi AxonTerminal! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of hacker groups several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:List of hacker groups, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, the first modifications were an error of judgment, after analysis, I gave the most adequate version. However it does not remain "my preferred version" but just additions that I should not have done. I'm new as an editor and I apologize. PS: I didn't read the end of the message on the main talk. I am sorry. In addition, I added 2 sources to my modification. AxonTerminal (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of hacker groups, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of hacker groups shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Stop adding this. Your sources do not appear to be reliable, and they do not support most of your claims in any case.'' Meters (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:List of hacker groups. ''Blanking my talk page thread is not going to help. And neither is using an IP to continue your edit war.'' Meters (talk) 03:36, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The IP address is not me. AxonTerminal (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure... and that's why the IP restored your edit to the article  ] and two minutes later you blanked the talk page thread about your edit . Meters (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)