User talk:AyYildizKibris

December 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Turkey. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice for report at WP:3RRN
You are welcome to participate. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 13:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Turkey. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 14:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Antalya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Antalya, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  03:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Antalya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 1 week from editing for immediately continuing to edit-war (indeed, with the same edits) on various articles immediately after the previous block expired. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but please note that further edit-warring on Turkey-related articles will almost inevitably result in a longer block - discuss these edits on the talkpages before making them. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Black Kite (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

So...
... I see you decided to continue your edit wars. Talkpages exist for a reason; go there, make your case for the changes others obviously disagree with. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You need to use talkpages. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. You have returned to exactly the same edit-warring edits that previously saw you blocked twice. However, "indefinite" does not mean "infinite" - if you show convincingly that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat this behaviour, you may be unblocked. To do this, add below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 18:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/AyYildizKibris for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)