User talk:Ayacantik

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! feydey 12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Advice on uploading images
Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.


 * Pick an image name.
 * When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.


 * Source the image.
 * On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so.  If it's from the web, give a URL.  If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.


 * Provide copyright and license information.
 * This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.
 * If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.)  Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like &#123;{GFDL}} or &#123;{PD-self}}.  Be sure to mention that you created the image.  If you're using &#123;{PD-self}}, you may also want to use &#123;{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.
 * If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content.  This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use".  Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.


 * Describe the image.
 * To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page.  Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. feydey 12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Damakjayadc0.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Damakjayadc0.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Kek Lapis Sarawak}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. - TexMurphy 13:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * If you wish us to accept the article, you must:
 * remove the author name and "&copy; All Rights Reserved" and licence the article under the GFDL
 * re-write it in an encyclopedic tone - and remove CAPITALISATION and excessive bold
 * post the article once only - you may use #redirect for alternative titles
 * remove all advertising. Assuming these are a traditional Sarawak delicacy, write about them thus. Any attempt to advertise will result in the article being deleted.
 * -- RHaworth 15:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

How do I rewrite the article? Can u give me link with WYSIWIG editor where I can I rewrite my article? Ayacantik 15:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Copy it from here to User:Ayacantik/sandbox and edit there. WYSIWIG indeed! Use the normal edit + frequent previews the same as the rest of us! Add section headings at an early stage so that you use the section edit feature. -- RHaworth 16:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I already edit my article. Try my best to following wikipedia format, plus learn to use wikipedia wysiwig editor. Pls check my article and let me know if anything that I should edit. Thanks. Ayacantik 17:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What, you have found a wysiwig editor! Where is it? Please tell me.
 * Are you Asiarose, is she your mother or what? OK, people will probably still say that you have written the article to sell Asiarose's cakes but I think you should give it a try.
 * You have my full permission to copy-and-paste your sandbox back onto Kek Lapis. You can then create redirects from alternative names and create incoming links from other articles. And do try and get some decent pictures! -- RHaworth 22:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

To RHaworth and mangojuice, thanks for watching my page. You both don't need to argue each other about this article to be published or not. If you think this page is spam or whatever, I will leave this wikipedia page and keep the article with me, because you both have more right in controlling wikipedia. Before that I would like to tell you something why do I want to keep this article which had been written by me and my mother (Asiarose) in wikipedia. English is not our mother tongue language, we are from Malaysia, and my mother is in Malaysia, while I'm living in USA with my own family. In 2003, in my website, I had tried to write article about this type of cake in English languague to introduce it to people, especially in Malaysia, and I notice the interest about this type of cake spreaded internationally. I did this because I want to appreciate my mother(Asiarose) who raise me and my siblings by making and selling this cakes, and also her teacher (Rabiah Amit) who taught her to make this cake. When I wrote this article, it was not a business matter because in our place, mostly people who booking cakes from my mother was not 'internet or computer person', they are not depend on internet, they just looking at my mama's business catalog. I did search at that time, and nobody wrote about Sarawakian Layered cakes online especially in English. So the article that me and my mother wrote was the first article onine that introduce and telling people the history of this cake. After I put the article online in 2003, I didn't check that website and I just left it without any updating. Recently I check the website and I found out in my website statistic that so many people looking information about Sarawakian Layered cakes in Malay language and in English language. Then, what upsetting me and my mother is, we found some cakes business websites, copying and stealing 100% the article that me and my mother wrote in English, without giving any credits to my mother (Asiarose), and the worse is, without giving any credits to the teacher (Rabiah Amit) who also her bestfriend, and they use that article for commercial to attract their customers, and they kept this article 'like' they are the 'original writer' especially they bought .com domain (while me and my mother only keep our article in free domain, which other people may think that 'we' 'copying' from that websites. We didn't want to make situation worse and argue with the websites owner, even asking them to write the credits and reference, thats's only being ignored by them. So I was thinking the best way to published the article and giving the credits to right person (Asiarose and her teacher, Rabiah Amit) is by writing the article in wikipedia. When I wrote the article in wikipedia, I was thinking to write the article only without any reference which link to the website. But it seem that in wikipedia format we should put the reference. When I put the reference or external link site which linking to my mother's cake website, you will see the webpage has written the same article where I wrote here. The website has many link buttons, included 'link button' to go to page where people can book the cake from my mother if they interested. This probably make u think that writing this article in wikipedia is advertising or spamming attempt, while my first intention is to write this article in wikiepdia for information or educational purpose. Actually I could remove the reference link if it is not wikipedia format. I mean, just keep the article without any link or reference but Im not sure if wikiepdia will accept that.

Well, thats all I can say. Anyway thanks for watching the article, I appreciate that...Itis ok if u delete it.. because u have right to do that.. (thanks RHworth for giving me full permission to write the article before).

Mangojuice, by the way, if the article that I wrote make u think thatway, maybe Dunkin_Donuts, Nestle , Starbucks , Walgreens , and others (with reference and external link to business website should be consider to be deleted to because they 'attempt' to 'advertise' and 'spamming' in this website, and not to tell the brief history of their company. Ayacantik 01:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Spamming
As far as I can tell, all the copies of your extensive advertisement (Kek Lapis, among lots of other copies) have now been deleted. Stop using Wikipedia for advertising, or you will be blocked. Also, if in the future you create useful articles, keep in mind that redirects can effectively give an article several different look-up points, and are far preferable to creating man copies of an article. Mango juice talk 18:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Mangojuice, what exactly did you think it was selling? -- RHaworth 22:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Damakjayadc0.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Damakjayadc0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Blanking
So if you I appreciate [my] work so much, why did you blank your sandbox? -- RHaworth 08:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth. I'm sorry, I didn't know why I do that. I just felt really bad and upset yesterday. Plus quite stress and tired because so many school works and home works that I had to do yesterday. I was thinking that the article will never be published. I just felt that my article was not good enough to be here. I was thinking to quit from wikiepdia. I really appreciate *your work taht helping me editing the article.I miss my mum and I felt I fail to save the article which me and her composed together longtime ago, and that article had been copied and stolen by other ppl without giving any credit to my mum.My mind was blank and in emotional when I click 'Save' after I blank my sandbox, and then I wakeup and realize I did a big mistake because I blank the sandbox with article which already being proofread by you (and not my original article with messy grammar). Oh my goodness! What did I do. I had no idea to get the article back. I'm glad to see the article here again today. And I hope you forgive me. And again, thank you very much for helping. You are a kind heart person. Ayacantik 04:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

= Today learning to use redirect.

File:Asiarosebtu.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asiarosebtu.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kekdamakjaya.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kekdamakjaya.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Kekwawasan.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kekwawasan.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Kekbahtera.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kekbahtera.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Puncarebung.jpg


The file File:Puncarebung.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Batudelima.jpg


The file File:Batudelima.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)