User talk:Ayan092

Welcome!

Hello, Ayan092, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mewar University, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Burpelson AFB (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Mewar University


The article Mewar University has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Burpelson AFB (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Equato Encryption


A tag has been placed on Equato Encryption, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nageh (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note that I tagged your article as "blatant nonsense", even though it may contain some neat ideas for a college freshman. The main reason why Wikipedia is not the place for such stuff is that your text is original research. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and should only contain material that has been well established, i.e., is notable and referenced in reliable (secondary) sources. Hope that helps. If you have any further questions feel free to ask! Nageh (talk) 22:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Equato Encryption‎


The article Equato Encryption‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --  At am a  頭 23:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Ok, Ayan and Akshay, you think your idea is so great that it should not be deleted. Apart from the fact that it is original research, which we cannot accept as I told you before and which you decide to ignore, what is the great idea? What are you trying to explain at all? Do you describe transformations of the plaintext to ciphertext, or transformations of the key space? If it is the former, what aspect of it generalizes Shannon's concept of a substitution-permutation cipher, and Luby-Rackoff's proof that a sufficiently iterated design provides a pseudo-random permutation? Do you understand anything of what I'm saying? I guess no. Your article will be deleted. Nageh (talk) 07:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Equato Encryption for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equato Encryption is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Equato Encryption until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  At am a  頭 16:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)