User talk:Ayanosh/Archive 1

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Ayanosh! Thank you for your contributions. I am Abhishek191288 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 17:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Kiran Bedi
Please avoid copy/pasting texts from the internet to wikipedia, this usually violates the WP:Plagiarsim and WP:Copyright policies, and the external writing style usually does not comply with encyclopedia standards. Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kiran Bedi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kiran Bedi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Confusing edit
Please explain Why did this happen? Please respond on my talk. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah No worries. One of the great things about Wikipedia is that you can't really ruin anything, since the previous versions are saved (and you reverted yourself anyway...) This can all be a little confusing at first, so please let me know if you need any help. You can use my talk (the "T" in my signature) or e-mail (the "M".) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Notability
New articles I noticed that you've created May I Hebb Your Attention Pliss and The Mine recently. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that these meet the notability guidelines. Wikipedia doesn't publish original research so we can only rely on what other sources say is important. You have to establish that several independent sources note the importance of these books as you create the article. Things like sales numbers, reviews in prominent publications, controversies, etc. make a book notable. Most books are not notable, though, so they don't merit an article on Wikipedia.

I've decided to userfy these articles--this way, you can work on them some without them being deleted. Once you have proven notability, then you can move them back into the main namespace. Again, please let me know if this is confusing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also They're now at User:Ayanosh/May I Hebb Your Attention Pliss and User:Ayanosh/The Mine. I've taken them out of the categories by adding colons at the beginning. As always, let me know if this is confusing... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Notability Reviews in professional publications are an excellent way to establish notability, so you have to explicitly cite this within the article. Create a section about the reception of the book(s) and that will demonstrate notability. Being a short article is fine--just try to mark it as such with a stub template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure I'm really not familiar with the AfC process, to be honest... You've done a fine job, though, and you're learning how Wikipedia works much faster than I did. As another pointer, I suggest you take a look at WP:LINKROT. Also, you accidentally deleted a lot of my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ayanosh/The Mine has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Mine, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 The Mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  :- ) DCS 17:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Religion
Please do not categorise living people according to what you believe their religion to be - as you have done at Manoj Tiwari - unless you can verify that they have self-identified as adherents to the faith. WP:BLP applies. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Sitush (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Templates and tables An infobox is a template that (usually) goes at the beginning of an article and floats to the right. For legislatures (e.g. United States Congress), you should use Infobox Legislature. There is documentation on that page to explain how it's used. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Since you are the nominator, I hope you'll actively participate in the review discussion! Thanks! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your signature
I am interested to learn, do you feel there is some mistake in your signature or you have actually created a signature like this? If you think there is some formatting error in your signature, leave a message in my talk page, I feel, I can help here! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 01:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Just came to say the same thing. :) Matthewedwards : Chat  01:41, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * thank you for the help:-)Ayanosh (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Change!
When you are making a requested change in the article, you can update that in the GA2 review page too, it'll help to understand that it (the reviewer's suggestion) has been answered! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Merging Shive wave machine into John N. Shive
Please don't speedy John N. Shive. I'm in the middle of merging the subset of his notable achievements Shive wave machine into a section of a larger article covering his whole career. Thanks! Woz2 (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Brahma Kamal
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I closed your nomination, Featured picture candidates/Brahma Kamal, as "Not promoted". We welcome your contributions to featured picture candidates and I encourage you to nominate more images. Before you do so, you may want to review the featured picture criteria. If you're unsure if a picture meets the criteria, feel free to add the image to picture peer review where experienced users will comment on it. Thanks. I hope to see you at FPC again. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Reference tags
The thing is, the tags say that additional sources are needed "for verification". Verification isn't really the issue with those articles; everything came out of those stats sites. If notability is in question, there are separate tags for that, but there is precedent for keeping articles on all NBA players, since sources are pretty much always available. In the case of Price, at least a few old newspaper articles are available, like. Zagal e jo^^^ 04:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I might take a look later, but it's not a priority for me at the moment. Zagal e jo^^^ 23:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive1
Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive1, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please don't add Category:India
Greetings, you recently added Category:India to Tripura. Note that top-level country cats are only supposed to have 3 or 4 articles total on their main page, with everything else going into sub-categories. Please refrain from adding top-level country-name categories to articles. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Bhagavad Gita
I have replied in my talk page. If you want to help in Bhagavad Gita article, you can help to revise Commentaries and translations section! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 10:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please don't "move" articles by cut-and-paste
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Pankaj Kapoor a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pankaj Kapur. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Aside from the history problem, it also splits up the article from its Talk page - that's how I noticed it. I see you did try to use a template to request a move but you almost never want to subst a template, and there's no such template as name change. You could have used Admin request, but WP:Requested_moves is the best way to do it. Incidentally, the convention on Wikipedia is that you add new posts to the bottom of the Talk page, not the top. FlagSteward (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
The article Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself?--Tito Dutta Message 17:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * You went through a very extensive and high quality WP:GAC review of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. I did the first review and noted numerous entirely uncited paragraphs. I was disappointed to see that a couple uncited paragraphs remain.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Gangs of Wasseypur
Hi there, your recent edits to the article of Gangs of wasseypur, surprised me ! As, you are known to be one of the best contributors to topics related to north India. Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Gangs of Wasseypur. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I am currently working on the article ( in my sand box) and if you would like to contribute we can collaborate. Thank you Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 09:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Gangs Of Wasseypur Part 1. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Gangs of Wasseypur
Hello. I don't quite understand why there is an article that focuses on both films, and separate articles for each film. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 would be good example of a similar type of release. Apart from that, I'm not sure I could be of much assistance. I am not too familiar with film articles. Statυs (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
If you were trying to nominate Venice, Utah for DYK, you haven't finished the process yet. You still haven't done step III: post at Template talk:Did you know. Thanks for the nomination, but I'm not sure the article meets DYK standards; it's pretty poorly sourced. You'll also want to rewrite the hook in good English. Cheers! Ntsimp (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Venice, Utah
Hello! Your submission of Venice, Utah at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maile66 (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Maile66 (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination
You don't have to do anything else. Just wait. It will eventually be moved into the queue by an admin when there is room. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 05:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Giosue Gallucci
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:44, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nigel Moore (cricketer)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Uttarakhand
Seems the article is getting developed nicely. Please be careful and systematic about reference formatting. In this preparatory phase, it is vital that references are formatted correctly and consistently. Examples of Indian state related featured articles should be modeled. West Bengal, although not in its finest form, is an ok example to follow. Tripura is also under development. Have a look.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The peer review of Tripura is here. Yes, by consistent formatting of references, I meant preferably using citation templates. Do not keep bare urls. --Dwaipayan (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Nigel Moore (cricketer)
Thanks for nominating Nigel Moore as DYK, please surprise when my talk page informed me he appeared on the main page. He's certainly an interesting cricketer from one of English crickets minor counties. He's certainly on my list to expand down the line! Thanks again. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Cool pR
Hey, that was a very nice PR of Tripura article. Great job. I have replied to your comments in the PR page, and made changes in the article accordingly. Thanks....--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ThanksAyanosh (talk) 17:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Bade Achhe Lagte Hain
You know. just because someone deletes information doesn't mean it's vandalism. In this situation you should use rollback in blue not rollback in red.--Anderson - what's up?  01:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar
Hi! That was a very pleasant barnstar! Thank you :) And yes, I am a guy. Keep up the good work...--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Re:Another PR
Hi Ayanosh, thanks for inviting me to the PR. Unfortunately, I have never looked into Geography related articles before and I'm afraid I cannot be of much help in Uttarakhand's PR. I edit mainly Bollywood related articles and that too I 'm unable to do for the past couple of weeks due to my immense official work. But, I'll try to find some time to look into the article and get back with some comments. BTW, great job on Uttarakhand. Keep up the good work and all the very best !!!  ...Msrag talk2me 06:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Drexel Collection
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Anderson - what's up?  04:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Vermont Ski and Snowboard Museum
Hello! Your submission of Vermont Ski and Snowboard Museum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - TP 23:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

DYK for John Wilson Crawford
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kumaon Kingdom
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Netherlands Indies Civil Administration
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)