User talk:Ayaz769

March 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sheikhupura, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Daska with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. (t) Josve05a  (c) 18:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Talagang, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. S M S Talk 18:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing Wikipedia only to promote a political party. You have been told that using Wikipedia for promotion is unacceptable. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

-->


 * Very few people ARE satisfied to be blocked... I could see no reason to unblock, based on your edits and request. I still can't. Someone else might. Peridon (talk) 17:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)