User talk:AybaraFaile

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, APQC, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, APQC appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. APQC has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:APQC and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:APQC with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:APQC.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright and WP:SPAM
Hi there, just seen your note on the talk page and it has been updated, yes, (GFDL would be better but anyway). Yet, the article was deleted for being WP:SPAM. I can restore it to a subpage of yours if you want, but in its previous state, it was simply an advertisement for the company. To be included in wikipedia it needs to be discussed in verifiable, third party, reliable sources. Would you like it in a subpage? Woody (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)