User talk:Aymeric Penven

September 2020
Hello Aymeric Penven. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Incubateur HEC Paris, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aymeric Penven. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  09:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm not sure what made you believe that I was getting paid to write the article about the incubator. I have mentored startups from their program, which is how I am familiar with their history, but I am not getting paid for it, nor do I work in the field of communications or PR or anything similar.
 * I didn't even share with anyone that I was creating this page so that wouldn't be particularly efficient if that was my job.
 * Anyway, please let me know what type of content you thought was not up to quality standards and I'll do my best to improve it in my future contributions. Aymeric Penven (talk) 11:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Incubateur HEC Paris. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.  scope_creep Talk  09:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Incubateur HEC Paris - Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Incubateur HEC Paris - Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Incubateur HEC Paris for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incubateur HEC Paris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Incubateur HEC Paris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  scope_creep Talk  15:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)