User talk:Ayyanali2100

Speedy deletion nomination of Imtiaz supermarket


A tag has been placed on Imtiaz supermarket, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro  talk  17:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gamerafts Inc


A tag has been placed on Gamerafts Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 11:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

List of video game developers
Please note that like most lists on Wikipedia, List of video game developers lists only entries where there is a Wikipedia article about the company. The only exceptions to this are a few cases where there is a Wikipedia article about one or more of the company's games (and ony if those are in fact listed in the article). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Well said but paon is also on that list but it also don't have any Notable games....

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
Most administrators have been on Wikipedia for many years before they get elected - two months is not nearly enough. I have deleted your nomination per WP:NOTNOW. I strongly suggest you read that and take it all in. Keep on making good edits, join in community discussions, and by all means try again in a few years. GiantSnowman 08:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * What makes you think there are 6 accounts? Why did you remove the disclosure of your two other accounts? What makes you think it's permissible to have other accounts who edit the same pages as this account? That's strictly against policy.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

But there is nothing wrong I did with these accounts. If you want to block then you can block other two accounts and leave Ayyanali2100 unblocked. Furthermore, I am new to Wikipedia and I was not aware of wikipedia policy previously. I am also not associated with Imtiaz supermarket by any means. You might be ymthinking that I am using multiple accounts to promote this page than this is totally false--Ayyanali2100(talk) 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is simply not the case that "there is nothing wrong I did with these accounts". You've been repeatedly pointed to WP:SOCK and clearly haven't bothered to read it. So let me highlight a part: "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people". You admit to having done this, but not that it's in violation of our policies. This simply shows you haven't read our policies, and means your unblock request will most certainly be denied. We've told you that you've been violating WP:SOCK. We've pointed you to WP:SOCK. You must go and read and understand WP:SOCK, and modify your unblock request so as to convince us you have read and understood WP:SOCK and we can be sure you won't use multiple accounts, in violation of WP:SOCK, again. --Yamla (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)