User talk:AzaToth/Archives/2010/December

Speedy noms
Could you take a look at this? I have been working on incorporating speedy rename/merge noms but I'm lost on how to make it put the nom on the right page and notify the user with the right template. Marcus Qwertyus   00:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Lorem ipsum
Template:Lorem ipsum has been nominated for merging with Template:Lorem Ipsum. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afad
Template:Afad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Barnstars/Section


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji (talk) 01:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Marijuana.png
Thanks for uploading File:Marijuana.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Twinkle


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Twinkle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jacob Hnri (Talk / Contributions) 18:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Twinkle on es.wikipedia
Dear AzaToth,

I was used to do maintenance in the Spanish Wikipedia using Twinkle. I like your tool really. But I noticed it produces some incompatibility problems with other gadgets, like "disappearing of the FA's stars", "changes in the history edition comparisons" and others (if you speak Spanish, read and ). Finally I gave up to use your tool for those reasons.

Could you fix these problems for us? I would help you in all that you need.

(Please, answer in my Spanish user discussion page, thx!) Flakinho (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)