User talk:AzaToth/Archives/2022/November

User Talk page use
Please never post at my talk page again. Thanks very much. -Roxy the dog 00:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

The fly on Roxy's page
Hello, AzaToth. I don't understand why you think the fly on Roxy's page (and on a number of other user talkpages; pinging JBW as an example) violates WP:SMI. I know you're an accomplished programmer, but this is surely more a common-sense issue. It seems to me that it's not Roxy who needs to explain why his fly doesn't do any harm, but rather you who need to explain why it does. Also, please keep in mind that traditionally, Wikipedia offers wide latitude to users to manage their user space as they see fit. (Roxy and JBW both stole the fly from my page, btw, though I eventually tired of it and removed it.) Bishonen &#124; tålk 13:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC).


 * It's the first time I seen that fly, and to me it's clearly interfering with the user interface and makes the page less accessible for users. I didn't mean to imply Roxy need to explain it, but merely if they could think of anything that I've been mistaking in the matter. → Aza Toth 15:12, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's a joke thing. The way it interferes with accessibility (by maybe 0.5 %) is part of the joke. Harmless, IMO. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC).
 * AzaToth, surely you have to be joking? No? You really, honestly think that this "makes the page less accessible for users"? And enough so to justify summarily removing it from an editor's talk page without consultation? Really? JBW (talk) 17:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't know it was such a contentious issue. To me it was a clear case of disruption of the Wikipedia interface, which "may be removed or remedied by any user". → Aza Toth 19:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It is disruption. Just disruption that some administrators engage in and therefor its "ok". But it's not, and if everyone would do this, it would get shut down pretty fast. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 18:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. You think Roxy is an admin, TheDJ? That would be incorrect. Bishonen &#124; tålk 20:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC).
 * I’m clearly talking about JBW and yourself. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 22:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

@Azatoth you are correct, but I took the fly to represent commentary on @User:Roxy the dog's role on Wikipedia. Consider How Houseflies Work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbachrac (talk • contribs) 17:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC) Bbachrac (talk) 18:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Have you read WP:NPA? Just askin. - Roxy the dog 18:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)